Agenda - 02-06-2018 8-a - Minutes

Browse Search

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 19 Proposed Signage Examples Landmark Monument 60' Height (max) 25' width (max) Portal Monument 36' Height (max) 22' Width (max) Noted Conditions • The developer has agreed to a condition to limit the percentage of lights left on after normal hours of business • The developer has agreed to reserve 1 % of the required parking in District 2 (exclusive of hotel parking) to support electric charging stations. • The project is consistent with the County and Town of Hillsborough Joint Planning Land Use Plan as reported by staff at the November 14, 2017 public hearing. 2020 Phase I — Build- map 2022 Buildout — map In Summary Commissioner Jacobs asked if there is an estimate of the breakdown of district 2; perhaps 30% retail and rest hotels or offices. Commissioner Jacobs referred to the final map, and said it is hard to see what is being proposed on such a small map. Commissioner Jacobs referred to phase 1 and the 2020 service road, and said there is a left turn lane in, and asked if there is a left turn lane out of the service road. Ed Sirgany, Traffic and Technology Engineer for Summit Engineering, said there is a proposed left turn lane for phase one. He said the drawing is not to scale, and it may be hard to see. He said the lane goes in and out. He said the recommended improvement was a 200 - foot storage lane, to allow rights and lefts to split out. He said in the 2022 build out, this is extended from 200 to 500 feet long. Commissioner Jacobs asked if this would have a traffic light in phase one. Ed Sigany said no. Commissioner Jacobs asked if up to 900,000 square feet of space would not generate enough traffic to warrant a light. Ed Sirgany said the final revision removed the residential component, and took the district one growth down to a more manageable traffic level. He said the traffic level is in line with the Department of Transportation (DOT) targets. Michael Harvey reminded the Board that it could find the same maps on pages 99 to 113 in this evening's packet Commissioner Jacobs referred to the west side of old 86, and asked if the property extends to the service road only, and not to the south of it. Ed Sirgany said they do not have any options on property south of the service road. Jim Parker said that is correct, but there is sufficient right of way to add a lane. Commissioner Jacobs said he was thinking of moving it farther from 1 -40. He said DOT breaks rules when it is desirable for DOT.