Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-22-2006-9b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2006
>
Agenda - 08-22-2006
>
Agenda - 08-22-2006-9b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/2/2017 3:33:18 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 9:40:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/22/2006
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20060822
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br /> DTCC has already signed contracts with MLB Construction Company, the low bidder for the <br /> project. The specifications required that the contractor hold pricing for the alternates for 90- <br /> days past the June 29 bid opening in order for the Commissioners to determine the extent of <br /> additional funding for the sustainable elements. The Alternates funded by the Board will be <br /> incorporated into the Construction Contract with the DTCC as an amendment to the Contract. <br /> FINANCIAL IMPACT: <br /> During long-range capital plan and future debt discussions this past spring, staff identified the <br /> DTCC satellite campus green building initiatives, along with several other County and school <br /> related projects, as either un- or under funded Board priorities. At that time, Commissioners <br /> directed staff to report to the Board at its August 31, 2006 work session regarding the <br /> affordability of all of these projects. Should the Board wish to fund one or more of the <br /> alternates outlined in the chart above, staff will incorporate the corresponding cost into <br /> information being prepared for the August 31, 2006 work session. <br /> The chart below compares the original architect's cast estimates with the actual bid amounts. <br /> Comparison of Sustainable Feature Costs <br /> Sustainable Feature Architect Actual Bid <br /> Estimate <br /> Alternate #2 - Aluminum Light <br /> $42,500 $124,000 <br /> Shelves <br /> Alternate #3 - Photovoltaic Array $30,000 $16,800 <br /> Alternate #4 - Domestic Water $30,000 $35,600 <br /> Solar System <br /> Alternate #5 - Rainwater $120,000 $195,000 <br /> Collection System <br /> Alternate #6 -Waterless Urinals none given $700 <br /> Alternate #7 - Operable Windows none given $36,800 <br /> Alternate #8 - 125 Vehicle Park & $341,000 <br /> Ride Lot(') <br /> Totall $222,500 $749,900 <br /> This bid reflects the total cost of a 125-vehicle Park & Ride Lot and <br /> does not reflect offsetting grant funds ($111,261) or currently available <br /> County pay-as-you-go funds ($50,000) <br /> Park and Ride Lot <br /> The lowest bid received for the 125-vehicle park and ride lot totaled $341,000. The proposed <br /> lot would serve as off-site parking for the County's downtown campus and would be served by a <br /> County operated shuttle service. The County has approximately $161,000 in available <br /> funding to offset the total cost of the park and ride lot. The chart below identifies those <br /> currently available revenues for construction of the park and ride lot: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.