Orange County NC Website
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />47 <br />• But county cooperative extension dollars are distributed more towards unincorporated <br />areas than the cities. <br />• Other things include payments from Carrboro to Chapel Hill to help fund public transit. <br />• Other programs have slight variations in them depending upon where the service is <br />located. <br />• Also recall that there are other differences such as differences in property taxes due to <br />differences in property valuation. <br />• All of these factors combine to make these small differences in the per capita numbers <br />between the cities. <br />• It does not appear though that there is a concerted effort at the county level to subsidize <br />one part of the county over the other <br />• Finally, recall that these numbers are a `snapshot'. If tax dollars are being saved into <br />reserve fund `X' that would mostly benefit town `Z', then today it might appear that town <br />`Z' is paying more and getting fewer services. <br />• But if this study was repeated in a few years from now when the reserved fund dollars <br />are being spent, than it might appear that town `Z' is paying less and getting more <br />services. <br />• Notice that whatever inequity exists at the jurisdiction level is driven largely by inequity in <br />the federal tax system and not the local tax system <br />Questions <br />8. Consent Agenda <br />• Removal of Any Items from Consent Agenda <br />- Item 8 -e by Commissioner Marcoplos. This item was discussed earlier in the evening, <br />between agenda items 4 and 5. <br />• Approval of Remaining Consent Agenda <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Burroughs, seconded by Commissioner Price to <br />approve the remaining items on the Consent Agenda. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />• Discussion and Approval of the Items Removed from the Consent Agenda <br />a. Minutes <br />The Board approved the minutes from December 4 and 12, 2017 as submitted by the Clerk to <br />the Board. <br />b. Motor Vehicle Property Tax Releases /Refunds <br />The Board adopted a resolution, which is incorporated by reference, to release motor vehicle <br />property tax values for seven taxpayers with a total of seven bills that will result in a reduction of <br />revenue, in accordance with the NCGS. <br />c. Property Tax Releases /Refunds <br />The Board adopted a resolution, which is incorporated by reference, to release property tax <br />values for three taxpayers with a total of seven bills that will result in a reduction of revenue in <br />accordance with North Carolina General Statute 105 -381. <br />d. Applications for Property Tax Exemption /Exclusion <br />The Board considered nine untimely applications for exemption /exclusion from ad valorem <br />taxation for nine bills for the 2017 tax year. <br />