Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />12 <br />traffic alignment /improvement shall be required to serve District 1 <br />allowing for both left and right turn access onto Old NC Highway 86. <br />This alternative shall be reviewed and approved by Orange County and <br />the NC Department of Transportation and shall be installed prior to the <br />approval of additional site plans in District 1 beyond the defined threshold <br />in the original /amended TIA. <br />Acquisition /dedication of additional right -of -way may be required to accommodate <br />intersection designs as detailed in the supplemental /amended TIA contained within <br />Attachment 6. Existing recommended conditions, already agreed to by the applicant, all <br />right -of -way acquisition shall be in accordance with applicable NC Department of <br />Transportation requirements. <br />At its January 10, 2018 meeting, the Board voted unanimously to recommend approval <br />of the proposed conditions associated with internal and external roadway development <br />consistent with the supplemental TIA. <br />For more information please refer to Attachment 5. <br />3. Revisions to project concept plan: <br />a. The BOCC had requested a concept site plan denoting the anticipated location of <br />parking areas, access roads, stormwater features, landscaping, building(s), etc. <br />for District(s) 1 and 2. <br />STAFF COMMENT. Please refer to Attachment 7. <br />b. A tree survey shall be required denoting the location of `specimen trees' in <br />District(s) 1 and 2. The survey should provide the location of significant foliage <br />(i.e. species, height, width, etc.) within the various development <br />areas. <br />STAFF COMMENT. The applicant has indicated they can provide a tree <br />survey at the time of the Site Plan application submittal to Orange County <br />following approval of the project. <br />C. A more detailed buffer plan denoting proposed /required project buffers (i.e. <br />perimeter, MTC, stream AND floodplain, roadway, etc.) including widths, <br />explanation of existing vegetation (i.e. pictures of the existing foliage being <br />preserved) or more detail (i.e. cross section and rendering) on how required <br />buffers would be replanted if necessary. <br />STAFF COMMENT. Please refer to Attachment 7. <br />4. Other Consideration (s): <br />a. A condition was recommended limiting the number of outdoor lighting features <br />being left on after local business operations close for the evening. There were <br />also additional suggestions the signs be required to be <br />extinguished after hours as well. This was to address concerns over light <br />pollution. <br />STAFF COMMENT. The applicant agreed with the suggested condition to <br />limit the number of outdoor lighting fixtures left on after normal business <br />hours, with the understanding that projects within Settlers Point must <br />follow the appropriate industry guideline standards including, but not <br />limited to: IES /ANSI, OSHA, etc. in order to maintain safe lighting <br />