Orange County NC Website
16 <br /> <br />• Jordan Lake Headwaters Nature Preserve <br />• Wildlife and Natural Connection Corridors between New Hope Creek and the Eno River <br />• Local Historic Landmarks (aka easements) <br /> <br />Orange County Lands Legacy Action Plan 2018-20 (map) <br />Commissioner Marcoplos referred to the funding options for these projects and said <br />social media is reporting that the Board of County Commissioners is blowing $5 million on <br />parks, which is not true since they are from past bonds. <br />David Stancil said about $2.4 million of the funds track back to the 2001 Parks and <br />Open Space bond. <br />Commissioner Marcoplos said there are also Payment in Lieu (PIL) funds, which are <br />generated by development as a fair way to generate parkland and recreational opportunities. <br />He said it would be illegal for the BOCC to use these funds for any other purpose. <br />David Stancil said PIL funds can only be used for park and open space land acquisition <br />or construction. He said the bond funds were converted to alternative financing, and the <br />original prohibition from the 2001 bond may no longer be in place. He said the public approved <br />the funds for park and recreational use. <br />Commissioner Marcoplos said using them for alternate projects may not be illegal, but <br />would be highly inappropriate. He said this information should be clearly explained to the <br />public. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said he appreciated Commissioner Marcoplos’ comments, and <br />having the money left could be a sign of frugality and caution of spending bond money. <br />Commissioner Jacobs suggested gathering visitation numbers from the parks and <br />facilities, and to adding them as an appendix to the plan. <br />Commissioner Jacobs reported when he attended the food meeting with Wake and <br />Durham counties, he thanked the City of Raleigh for the money spent to protect its watershed in <br />northern Orange County. He said he spoke with representatives from Durham, and reminded <br />them that Durham has taken no similar action. He said further discussion can be had about <br />municipalities contributing to the protection of water supplies. <br />Commissioner Rich said Wake County’s contribution to protecting the watersheds was <br />also mentioned at the TJCOG meeting last week. She said the meeting notes may be helpful in <br />composing any potential letter on this issue. <br />Commissioner Rich referred to the idea of gathering data on park usage, and said <br />Hollow Rock Park has proved far more popular than expected. She said numbers on parks <br />would be easy to gather. <br />Chair Dorosin said this program is very successful, but he has concerns that acquisition <br />is exceeding the usage of these parklands. He said it is discouraging to the public to see land <br />acquired and not developed as envisioned. He said he would like to review and re-prioritize <br />needs, which may be better done through a work session discussion. <br />Commissioner Burroughs said she views this differently, and considers parkland as land <br />banking, available to future generations. She said she does not think the public is clamoring for <br />park development, and she looks forward to a longer conversation on this topic. <br />Chair Dorosin asked if this Board wanted to prioritize developing parks, is it permitted to <br />use these land legacy monies. <br />David Stancil said the Board could do so, and steps were taken last year in the CIP. He <br />said land banking was done consciously for the future time when the land was needed. He <br />said some parks have taken much longer than expected, but construction costs are different <br />than acquisition costs. <br />