Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-23-2018 7-a - Report on the Orange County Tax Equity Study
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2018
>
Agenda - 01-23-2018
>
Agenda - 01-23-2018 7-a - Report on the Orange County Tax Equity Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2018 10:52:26 AM
Creation date
1/22/2018 8:39:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/23/2018
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7-a
Document Relationships
Agenda - 01-23-2018 - Regular Meeting Agenda
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 01-23-2018
Minutes 01-23-2018
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M <br />Appendix B <br />Consider the hypothetical situation of Mr. Smith and Mr. Jones. Mr. Smith is renting and <br />living in a house owned by Mr. Jones. The house is located in Mebane so that Mr. Smith is <br />living in Mebane. However, Mr. Jones, the owner of the property, actually lives in Georgia and <br />receives the tax bill at his home address in Atlanta, Georgia. Mr. Jones pays the property tax bill <br />which is used by Orange County government to provide government services to Mr. Smith. Mr. <br />Smith, an Orange County resident, pays none of the property tax but receives the benefits of the <br />Orange County provided government services. Mr. Jones, a Georgia resident, pays all of the <br />Orange County property tax, but receives none of the Orange County provided government <br />services. In situations like this, Orange County is in effect, exporting its tax burden to Atlanta, <br />Georgia.24 <br />It is possible under special conditions that some of the property tax burden that Mr. Jones <br />faces can be shifted to Mr. Smith in the form of higher rent on the property so that in effect, Mr. <br />Smith is `paying' part of the property tax via higher `rent'. Also, it is possible that Mr. Jones <br />will still receive some of the benefits of the Orange County government provided services even <br />if he doesn't live in Orange County. This could occur through government provided benefits that <br />indirectly help Mr. Jones through lower homeowners insurance costs, increased property values, <br />etc. In effect, Orange County has now `exported' some of the government provided benefits <br />derived from the property tax. Since there is no data on these special conditions, they are <br />ignored. For simplicity, it is assumed that Orange County is exporting its tax burden to any <br />property tax payer who doesn't live in Orange County. Furthermore, it is assumed for this study <br />that any resident of a municipality within Orange County who owns property in another part of <br />as The concept of tax exportation by local and state governments is well understood, but it can be difficult to <br />quantify the exact amount of a tax that is truly exported. <br />CCM Economics, LLC Orange County Tax Equity Page 43 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.