Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
:l <br />1 Attachment 5 <br />2 Summary of Comments from the <br />3 January 10, 2018 <br />4 Planning Board Meeting <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 MEMBERS PRESENT: Lydia Wegman (Chair), At -Large Chapel Hill Township <br />s Representative; Tony Blake (Vice- Chair), Bingham Township Representative; Patricia <br />9 Roberts, Cheeks Township Representative; Paul Guthrie, At -Large Chapel Hill <br />to Township; Kim Piracci, At- Large; Township; Alexander Gregory, Chapel Hill Township <br />11 Representative; David Blankfard, Hillsborough Township Representative; Randy <br />12 Marshall, At- Large; Adam Beeman, Cedar Grove Township; Hunter Spitzer, At- Large; <br />13 Buddy Hartley, Little River Township Representative; <br />14 <br />15 MEMBERS ABSENT: Laura Nicholson, Eno Township Representative; <br />16 <br />17 STAFF PRESENT: Craig Benedict, Planning Director; Michael Harvey, Current Planning <br />18 Supervisor; Patrick Mallett, Planner II; Meredith Kern, Administrative Assistant; <br />19 <br />20 OTHERS PRESENT: Jim Parker, Summit Engineering; Timothy Smith, Summit <br />21 Engineering; Ed Sirgany, Summit Engineering; Brian Quintan, Calvert Energy; <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 AGENDA ITEM 9: MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION — SETTLER'S POINT - To <br />25 continue review and discussion of comments made at the November 14 quarterly public <br />26 hearing, proposed revisions to conditions as a result of comments, and to make a <br />27 recommendation on the proposed revisions concerning an application for an MPD -CZ <br />28 (Master Plan Development Conditional Zoning). The proposed project encompasses <br />29 approximately 195 acres in the Hillsborough Economic Development District (EDD) <br />30 south of Interstate 40 on both sides of Old Highway 86. The public hearing for this item <br />31 has been extended until January 23, 2018. <br />32 SYNOPSIS OF DISCUSSION POINTS: <br />33 1. CONDITION 13 — LAND USES — The Planning Board was asked to review the <br />34 proposed land uses within the project and determine if they were acceptable. <br />35 Board members reiterated support for the proposed land uses indicating the <br />36 applicant had proposed uses consistent with the provisions of Section 5.2.3 of <br />37 the UDO (i.e. the table of permitted land uses for Conditional Zoning Districts) as <br />38 well as pending revisions as proposed by staff as part of the table of permitted <br />39 use project. <br />40 Staff reminded the Board at its December 18, 2017 regular meeting there was an <br />41 attachment to the agenda outlining the questions posed at the November 14, <br />42 2017 public hearing as well as responses to same. This includes an analysis of <br />43 the proposed uses for the project. <br />44 2. CONDITION 6 — At the November 14, 2017 public hearing, the applicant <br />45 objected to the imposition of a condition granting approval /denial authority to the <br />46 Orange Rural Volunteer Fire Department. They suggested the condition be <br />47 modified to require the review of development proposals by the Orange Rural <br />48 Volunteer Fire Department while maintaining `approval authority' on fire code <br />49 issues with the County and Town Fire Marshal. <br />