Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-23-2018 5-a - Zoning Atlas Amendment - Conditional Zoning – Master Plan Development Conditional Zoning District (MPD-CZ) Settlers Point
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2018
>
Agenda - 01-23-2018
>
Agenda - 01-23-2018 5-a - Zoning Atlas Amendment - Conditional Zoning – Master Plan Development Conditional Zoning District (MPD-CZ) Settlers Point
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2018 10:29:32 AM
Creation date
1/22/2018 8:39:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/23/2018
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5-a
Document Relationships
Agenda - 01-23-2018 - Regular Meeting Agenda
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 01-23-2018
Minutes 01-23-2018
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2018
Statement of Approval and Consistency Statement - Settler's Point 012318
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2010 - 2019\2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
174
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
:i <br />441 <br />442 Lydia Wegman said 30 percent makes sense. Tony Blake agreed. <br />443 <br />444 Michael Harvey said a county commissioner suggested a condition to limit business hours. The applicant has <br />445 indicated that such a condition is incredibly problematic. Staff has not pursued a condition on that. Lydia Wegman <br />446 said that makes sense. <br />447 <br />448 Michael Harvey reviewed the applicant has addressed the concern of overall buffer impacts of the project and there <br />449 will be more discussion in January. <br />450 <br />451 Paul Guthrie asked what the terrain would be around the stormwater ponds. Will they be empty and full depending on <br />452 the rainfall, he asked. Michael Harvey answered as the stormwater facilities haven't necessarily been submitted for <br />453 review, he doesn't know if they will be full constantly or only full as there is inundation. Typically, there is landscaping <br />454 around the feature. A stormwater facility doesn't necessarily mean a big pond. It can be a rain garden. It can be a <br />455 subterranean facility. Since there will be a push for capturing stormwater, he thinks the facility will be minimal. There <br />456 are some limitations we'll have to live with within state law. He thinks the developer will avoid big mosquito pits <br />457 because it's bad for development. <br />458 <br />459 Paul Guthrie said he wanted more specifics. Michael Harvey said any time a stormwater feature is developed, the <br />460 county requires the developer secure a maintenance agreement and submit documentation. Development in Orange <br />461 County is held to a stormwater standard. It will be addressed on every feature. Developers are required to post bonds <br />462 to maintain the stormwater features. <br />463 <br />464 Craig Benedict reminded the board the next meeting is not Jan. 3 but instead Jan. 10. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.