Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-23-2018 5-a - Zoning Atlas Amendment - Conditional Zoning – Master Plan Development Conditional Zoning District (MPD-CZ) Settlers Point
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2018
>
Agenda - 01-23-2018
>
Agenda - 01-23-2018 5-a - Zoning Atlas Amendment - Conditional Zoning – Master Plan Development Conditional Zoning District (MPD-CZ) Settlers Point
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2018 10:29:32 AM
Creation date
1/22/2018 8:39:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/23/2018
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5-a
Document Relationships
Agenda - 01-23-2018 - Regular Meeting Agenda
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 01-23-2018
Minutes 01-23-2018
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2018
Statement of Approval and Consistency Statement - Settler's Point 012318
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2010 - 2019\2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
174
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WV <br />Approved 11/01/2017 <br />Paul Guthrie asked about a transmission line about a block- and -a -half from the site. Have there been discussions <br />with the power company about this line? <br />Michael Harvey replied that no, there have not because no site plan has been submitted yet. While Staff knows there <br />is service availability, it is currently unclear which use will be reviewed for approval first. It is incumbent upon the <br />developer to make improvements on utilities for the good of the project, just like any developer in Orange County <br />when it comes to utility upgrades. As site plans come -in, the Town of Hillsborough will decide if they can handle <br />capacity, and if they cannot, the use cannot be approved. <br />Paul Guthrie asked if the developer will pay for additional costs associated with this. <br />Michael Harvey responded that if a developer wants utility upgrades for a project, they will have to pay for it. He <br />cannot comment for the Town of Hillsborough. <br />Paul Guthrie noted that there has been an interesting dialogue going on with Hillsborough on this project, as he read <br />in the materials provided. <br />Michael Harvey agreed and said that most of that dialogue is on District 3. Ms. Hauth's letter voicing concern over the <br />Town serving a residential project this far south, outside the Town's corporate limits, is included in the materials given <br />to the Board. These are the issues to discuss further. <br />Paul Guthrie said that Hillsborough will have to weigh capacity of water needs /use based on what gets built on the <br />site. <br />Michael Harvey replied that applicants have to provide information for site plan review to figure out these very issues. <br />Craig Benedict said that in regards to water capacity for District 1, the agreement that the County has with <br />Hillsborough does have a certain allocation — 108,000 gallons /day. This is part of the agreement in that area. Any <br />uses that come forward will have to spread -out over the 148 acres or so to accommodate the capacity. For other <br />issues outside of District 1, District 2, and possibly District 3, there will have to be an independent agreement <br />between Hillsborough and the developer to negotiate water and sewer consumption. The County is involved with the <br />District 1 agreement because the County is involved with getting the sewer system under the interstate and <br />beginning the loop of a water system to support that project and more. <br />Michael Harvey said that Staff's recommendation is for the Board to receive this application, to deliberate, and <br />consider the following recommendation: Table action on District 3 with a recommendation to the elected officials that <br />this area (District 3) come back to the Planning Board for continued review and discussion for your April 2018 <br />meeting. If there is action that would enable District 3 to be acted upon by the County, the Board would have <br />sufficient time to do so. Staff wants to avoid the unnecessary re- advertisements if the Planning Board can review this <br />at a later time after the elected officials make a recommendation. <br />Tony Blake asked if NIMs for District 3 are done. <br />Michael Harvey replied that the NIMs for the entire project are done. He continued with the recommendation. Staff <br />recommends that the Board approve the Statement of Consistency in Attachment 6 with the provision that any <br />references to property in District 3 be eliminated; approve the ordinance, Attachment 7, which has already been <br />modified to eliminate references to District 3. Mr. Harvey said that he will fix some errors in Attachment 7 at the <br />appropriate time, once he gets more direction from the Board. He turned the presentation over to the applicant. <br />Someone from the audience asked when the public would be able to make comments. <br />Lydia Wegman replied that the applicant will make his presentation and then the public will be invited to speak. <br />N. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.