Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-23-2018 5-a - Zoning Atlas Amendment - Conditional Zoning – Master Plan Development Conditional Zoning District (MPD-CZ) Settlers Point
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2018
>
Agenda - 01-23-2018
>
Agenda - 01-23-2018 5-a - Zoning Atlas Amendment - Conditional Zoning – Master Plan Development Conditional Zoning District (MPD-CZ) Settlers Point
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2018 10:29:32 AM
Creation date
1/22/2018 8:39:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/23/2018
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5-a
Document Relationships
Agenda - 01-23-2018 - Regular Meeting Agenda
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 01-23-2018
Minutes 01-23-2018
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2018
Statement of Approval and Consistency Statement - Settler's Point 012318
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2010 - 2019\2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
174
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
13 <br />Approved 11/01/2017 <br />Development isreviewed. This area is not in a land use classification that will allow the review of this project. Mr. <br />Harvey continued with the presentation and discussed the rezoning of the subject parcels of property from Economic <br />Development — Hillsborough 2 (EDH -2), Economic Development — Hillsborough Office /Retail (EDH -4), Economic <br />Development — Hillsborough Research and Manufacturing (EDH -5) to Master Plan Development Conditional Zoning <br />(MPD -CZ). He also noted that there are portions of the property within the Special Flood Hazard Area District <br />Overlay, and until the Overlay is eliminated, it has to be referenced. District 1 is intended to allow for research and <br />manufacturing land uses (see revised Attachment 7, page 307). The first parcel of property is 148 acres (see <br />breakdown of each Parcel Identification Number in packet) of land to be rezoned to allow for research, manufacturing <br />and industrial land uses. It is west of Old NC 86, south of the interstate, and is currently accessed via a service road. <br />As noted, these properties are located with an economic development transition area, according to the Future Land <br />Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan, allowing for the MPD -CZ. District 2 encompasses 10 total parcels covering 47 <br />acres in area; it is intended to be commercially- zoned. It is located east of Old NC 86, south of interstate, and is <br />currently accessible via Old NC 86. It is also located within an economic development transition area which allows for <br />a MPD -CZ. The intended land uses include office, retail, service operation, hotels, restaurants, etc. He reminded the <br />Board that District 3 is not being discussed at this meeting. Mr. Harvey briefly reviewed the MPD -CZ rezoning <br />process wherein Staff reviews the proposed plan which, being different than a Special Use Permit, does not require <br />sworn testimony as part of the application. The schedule of review of this project started with a Neighborhood <br />Information Meeting (NIM) on the September 14, 2017 per the UDO. The developer held its own neighborhood <br />meetings without Planning Staff for adjacent property owners. The second action in the review process is for the <br />Planning Board to make a recommendation and then the project will go before a public hearing, which if <br />recommended, will go to the upcoming November 14, 2017 Quarterly Public Hearing. Per Section 2.9.2 (F) (3) of the <br />LIDO, mutually- agreed -upon conditions can be imposed, addressed compatibility with the proposed development with <br />surrounding property, and proposed development of support facilities and other matters the County may find <br />appropriate, and the petitioner may propose. The applicant and Staff have created conditions through this <br />mechanism. If approved, the Zoning Atlas would be modified to change the 10 properties identified to MPD -CZ, <br />allowing for the development of the Settler's Point project. Mr. Harvey said that the development of individual land <br />uses will be handled by Staff (i.e. reviewing site plans for permissible uses) but there will be no additional Board <br />review. This proposal would establish a zoning district and development will be accordance with the UDO along with <br />any specified condition articulated in Attachment 7 that the developer has asked to be imposed. <br />Tony Blake asked if there would be special uses. <br />Michael Harvey replied that Mr. Blake's question would be reviewed later in the presentation. He continued with his <br />remarks saying that the Boards would only review this proposal again if the developers proposed an amendment to <br />the Master Plan. Mr. Harvey summarized the conditions (25 pages) of which the applicant is imposing. One condition <br />is that the project is not guaranteed utility services by the Town of Hillsborough. With respect to utilities, the applicant <br />must comply with the provisions in the UDO. The developer proposes that the project be served by public water and <br />sewer and Staff agrees. Utility provision must meet UDO and Town standards. Mr. Harvey said that extension of <br />utility services to District 2 shall have to be reviewed and approved by the Town of Hillsborough prior to its <br />development. The County is working on a detailed agreement with Hillsborough but the County has already <br />committed to extend water and sewer under the interstate, which could be used to serve District 1. The extension of <br />utility services to District 2 would have to go through a similar process by the Town amending its agreement to allow <br />for water and sewer to serve District 2. <br />Lydia Wegman asked if the County would do the extension. <br />Michael Harvey replied that it would be on the developer or successor to secure this extension; it is up to the <br />individual(s) proposing the project. Mr. Harvey said that the project must go through site plan review per the UDO <br />and that per the developer's recommendation, all submittals will be subject to an environmental and transportation <br />impact analyses. He reviewed that an environmental assessment (or Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)) looks <br />into potential negative impacts on environmental features on the property (namely water bodies, floodplain, <br />wetlands), soil composition, best location for a road, and weighs environmental constraints on the property. Staffs <br />site plan review takes into consideration this assessment to ensure that environmental conditions are not <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.