Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
115 <br />From: Michael Harvey [ mailto :mharvey @orangecountync.gov] <br />Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2017 3:56 PM <br />To: Jim Parker (iimparkerl6 @gmail.com) <4imparker16 @gmail.com >; Ariel Gamboa <br /><ariel.gamboa @summitde.net >; Edward W Sirgany <ed.sirgany @summitde.net> <br />Cc: Travis Myren <tmyren@orangecountync.gov >; Craig Benedict <cbenedict @orangecountync.gov> <br />Subject: Additional documentation on Settlers Point <br />Based on comment(s) received from the Planning Board at its December 18, 2017 <br />meeting, the following shall be required for submittal /re- submittal to staff for <br />review and comment. This information will be presented for discussion at the <br />January 10, 2017 continued review of Settlers Point. <br />(Applicant comment responses: 1212812017) <br />1. Supplemental detail submitted by Mr. Ed Sirgany (maps attached for <br />reference purposes) on the TIA map(s) addresses part of staff's request for <br />more information on internal /external roadway improvement needs with <br />respect to this project. We are pleased the u -turn option appears to no <br />longer be a 'foregone conclusion'. Having said that the Director is <br />requesting the following additional detail: <br />a. On the maps provide a table of contents outlining what improvement <br />is proposed per the TIA. For example if the TIA makes reference to a <br />condition as Install traffic light at Old NC Highway 86 and 1 -40 add a <br />note to the map denoting same (i.e. reference the conditions in a <br />table /matrix on the maps). <br />(Response: The referenced table /matrix has been added to cross reference <br />the improvements noted in the TIA.) <br />2. A revised master landscape /buffer plan denoting a 100 ft. buffer along the <br />southern portion of District 2. Please note the Planning Board agreed the <br />anticipated access roadway location, north of the overhead power line <br />utility easement, would not have to be buffered. <br />(Response: A revised master landscape /buffer plan is provided to denote the <br />addition of the 100 ft. along the southern portion of District 2.) <br />3. Denote the required floodplain buffer per Section 6.13 of the UDO on <br />property located within District 1. <br />(Response: The referenced floodplain buffer has been added to the master <br />landscape /buffer plan.) <br />