Browse
Search
7-a - Report on the Orange County Tax Equity Study
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2018
>
Agenda - 01-23-2018
>
7-a - Report on the Orange County Tax Equity Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2018 5:01:45 PM
Creation date
1/19/2018 4:59:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/23/2018
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7-a
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />CCM Economics, LLC Orange County Tax Equity Page 27 <br /> <br />animal taxes, and the beer and wine tax. Other than the motor vehicle tax, these taxes constitute <br />a small amount of revenue for the county. In 2015, the motor vehicle tax collected $9.3 million. <br />Taxes such as these tend to correlate very strongly with property taxes. Other taxes, such as the <br />animal tax, only apply to people who license a new dog or cat, and correlate with population. <br />Other permits and fees include the privilege license that applies to different professions and <br />businesses such as pawn brokers, loan agencies, and check cashers. This license fees only <br />collected $15,000 in 2015. Other permits include the franchise fee which collected a little over <br />$300,000 in 2015. <br />The final category worth mentioning is Orange County fees for services. This includes a <br />wide range of activities including emergency management, deed registration, and the sheriff’s <br />office. Many of these fees are straightforward and can be easily assigned to the different <br />geographic subunits. For example, deed registration is flat fee that doesn’t change based upon <br />the location of the property, but on the number of pages in the deed. Similarly, marriage licenses <br />are a constant cost for every citizen regardless of where the live. Other charges for service are <br />related to quantity of the service provided. In 2015, the sheriff’s office received $2.311 million <br />for services—however, these monies are mostly derived from payments from the federal <br />government to offset the cost of housing federal inmates, and therefore should not be counted.16 <br />A detailed inspection of the budgets and annual comprehensive financial documents for <br />the four different municipalities was also undertaken. A similar methodology to that used for <br />Orange County was used to assign per capita revenue and expenditures for each citizen in the <br /> <br />16 In essence, the citizens of Orange County have paid federal income taxes to the federal government. The federal <br />government has now taken some of these tax dollars and paid them back to the Orange County government to offset <br />the cost to the local citizen of housing federal inmates. This has the effect of canceling the cost to all citizens and <br />shifting it to the citizens who pay federal income taxes. Therefore, this ‘cost’ has already been counted once —in the <br />portion of taxes paid to the federal government. If it was to be counted again, it would be double counting and give <br />an inaccurate picture of how much citizens are actually paying for government services. <br />64
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.