Browse
Search
7-a - Report on the Orange County Tax Equity Study
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2018
>
Agenda - 01-23-2018
>
7-a - Report on the Orange County Tax Equity Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2018 5:01:45 PM
Creation date
1/19/2018 4:59:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/23/2018
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7-a
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />CCM Economics, LLC Orange County Tax Equity Page 21 <br /> <br />who is assessed for property taxes on real property within county lines. It is therefore somewhat <br />straight forward to determine the amount of property taxes paid by citizens of a particular <br />municipality. Other components were harder to determine. For example, currently the county <br />funds several parks. These parks are not restricted to citizens of Orange County but are available <br />to everyone. Furthermore, some of the parks are easier to access for some citizens than for <br />others. If a park is located in the northwest corner of the county, there is no legal restriction on <br />citizens from the southeast corner of the county from using the park. It is though, ceteris paribus, <br />more difficult for the citizen in the southeast corner to use the park than it would be for a citizen <br />in the northwest corner of the county. <br /> This study though is primarily focused on not who uses county and municipally provided <br />services, but if they are available to all citizens who are funding that particular service.13 <br />Returning to the illustration of the park in the previous paragraph, if the park is funded by a <br />county wide tax that is paid by all citizens and is available for all citizens to use, then one could <br />say that this is ‘equitable’. If, however, the tax to fund the park was assessed on all Orange <br />County citizens but the park facilities were only allowed to be used by the citizens of <br />Hillsborough, then one could say that this is ‘unequitable’. The only way that having an Orange <br />County government provided good or service for certain citizens of the county could be <br />‘equitable’ was if onl y those citizens who paid the special assessment for the service were <br />allowed to use the service. In this example, if the citizens of Hillsborough paid a special Orange <br />County government assessment for a park, then one could argue that it would be ‘equitable’ to <br />allow only citizens of Hillsborough to use it. In fact, allowing citizens of Chapel Hill to use the <br /> <br />13 However, the question of who is using different county government services can be answered through the results <br />of the survey. <br />58
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.