Orange County NC Website
At its December 18, 2017 regular meeting, the Board voted unanimously to 50 <br />approve the revised condition as suggested by the applicant. 51 <br />At its January 10, 2018 regular meeting, the Board reiterated its support for a 52 <br />revised condition indicating the Orange Rural Volunteer Fire Department will offer 53 <br />review comment(s) on all site plans but will not have approval authority. 54 <br />3. CONDITION 13 (h) (vi) Major Transportation Corridor (MTC) BUFFER – During 55 <br />the November 14, 2017 public hearing, concern was expressed over the 56 <br />proposed clearing of the MTC buffer as allowed within Section 6.6.4 (A) of the 57 <br />UDO (i.e. clearing only 50% of the MTC Buffer). The applicant was requested to 58 <br />provide additional details/ a development schematic on the requested clearing to 59 <br />assist in reviewing the viability of the recommended condition. 60 <br />During the meeting staff informed the Board there is approximately 2,800 ft. of 61 <br />Interstate frontage for property located within District 1 and 3,082 ft. for property 62 <br />located within District 2. The MTC buffer in District 1 shall remain undisturbed. 63 <br />With respect to District 2, the applicant is proposing the following: 64 <br />a. Reduce the width of the MTC from 100 ft. to 50 ft. in width, beginning at the 65 <br />intersection of Old NC Highway 86 with the Interstate 40 on-ramp, extending 66 <br />approximately 2,000 ft. east. 67 <br />Staff informed the Board the total area encumbered by the MTC Buffer in 68 <br />District 2 is 308,200 sq.ft. (3,082 ft. of linear frontage along Interstate 40 69 <br />multiplied by the standard MTC Buffer width of 100 ft.). 70 <br />Approximately 154,100 sq.ft. of MTC Buffer could be ‘cleared’ per Section 71 <br />6.6.4 (A) of the UDO (i.e. 50% of the buffer). 72 <br />The applicant is proposing to reduce the MTC Buffer from 100 ft. to 50 ft. for 73 <br />approximately 2,000 linear ft., reducing the required buffer by 100,000 sq.ft. 74 <br />(2,000 ft. of linear frontage along Interstate 40 multiplied by the 50 ft. MTC 75 <br />Buffer reduction). 76 <br />b. The remaining 1,082 linear ft. of Interstate frontage will have an MTC Buffer 77 <br />width of 100 ft. Note this area includes property encumbered by an existing 78 <br />150 ft. wide utility easement (i.e. overhead power lines). Foliage within this 79 <br />easement has already been eliminated. 80 <br />c. Within the 2,000 linear feet of reduced MTC Buffer area, the applicant is 81 <br />proposing to create 1,100 linear feet of visual breaks for the project. These 82 <br />areas would be re-landscaped with ‘low-growth landscaping’ to a width of 50 83 <br />ft. including shrubs achieving a height of 4 to 6 ft. and canopy trees 84 <br />achieving a height of no more than 12 ft. 85 <br />d. Both the staff and the applicant indicated a 100 ft. wide land use buffer shall 86 <br />be maintained along the southern boundary of District 2, exclusive of the 87 <br />utility easement, to provide additional noise and visual buffer(s) for the 88 <br />project. 89 <br />The Planning Board recommended the following condition(s): 90 <br />i. A 100 ft. wide land use buffer shall be established/preserved 91 <br />along the southern boundary of District 2. 92 <br />84