Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
1 2 3 <br /> 4 5 <br /> 6 <br />MEMBERS PRESENT: Lydia Wegman (Chair), At-Large Chapel Hill Township 7 <br />Representative; Tony Blake (Vice-Chair), Bingham Township Representative; Patricia 8 <br />Roberts, Cheeks Township Representative; Paul Guthrie, At-Large Chapel Hill 9 <br />Township; Kim Piracci, At-Large; Township; Alexander Gregory, Chapel Hill Township 10 <br />Representative; David Blankfard, Hillsborough Township Representative; Randy 11 <br />Marshall, At-Large; Adam Beeman, Cedar Grove Township; Hunter Spitzer, At-Large; 12 <br />Buddy Hartley, Little River Township Representative; 13 <br /> 14 <br />MEMBERS ABSENT: Laura Nicholson, Eno Township Representative; 15 <br /> 16 <br />STAFF PRESENT: Craig Benedict, Planning Director; Michael Harvey, Current Planning 17 <br />Supervisor; Patrick Mallett, Planner II; Meredith Kern, Administrative Assistant; 18 <br /> 19 <br />OTHERS PRESENT: Jim Parker, Summit Engineering; Timothy Smith, Summit 20 <br />Engineering; Ed Sirgany, Summit Engineering; Brian Quintan, Calvert Energy; 21 <br /> 22 <br /> 23 <br />AGENDA ITEM 9: MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – SETTLER’S POINT - To 24 <br />continue review and discussion of comments made at the November 14 quarterly public 25 <br />hearing, proposed revisions to conditions as a result of comments, and to make a 26 <br />recommendation on the proposed revisions concerning an application for an MPD-CZ 27 <br />(Master Plan Development Conditional Zoning). The proposed project encompasses 28 <br />approximately 195 acres in the Hillsborough Economic Development District (EDD) 29 <br />south of Interstate 40 on both sides of Old Highway 86. The public hearing for this item 30 <br />has been extended until January 23, 2018. 31 <br />SYNOPSIS OF DISCUSSION POINTS: 32 <br />1. CONDITION 13 – LAND USES – The Planning Board was asked to review the 33 <br />proposed land uses within the project and determine if they were acceptable. 34 <br />Board members reiterated support for the proposed land uses indicating the 35 <br />applicant had proposed uses consistent with the provisions of Section 5.2.3 of 36 <br />the UDO (i.e. the table of permitted land uses for Conditional Zoning Districts) as 37 <br />well as pending revisions as proposed by staff as part of the table of permitted 38 <br />use project. 39 <br />Staff reminded the Board at its December 18, 2017 regular meeting there was an 40 <br />attachment to the agenda outlining the questions posed at the November 14, 41 <br />2017 public hearing as well as responses to same. This includes an analysis of 42 <br />the proposed uses for the project. 43 <br />2. CONDITION 6 – At the November 14, 2017 public hearing, the applicant 44 <br />objected to the imposition of a condition granting approval/denial authority to the 45 <br />Orange Rural Volunteer Fire Department. They suggested the condition be 46 <br />modified to require the review of development proposals by the Orange Rural 47 <br />Volunteer Fire Department while maintaining ‘approval authority’ on fire code 48 <br />issues with the County and Town Fire Marshal. 49 <br />Attachment 5 <br />Summary of Comments from the <br />January 10, 2018 <br />Planning Board Meeting <br />83