Orange County NC Website
19 <br /> <br />Commissioner Burroughs asked if it is known when the District I extension of water and <br />sewer be completed. <br />Craig Benedict said probably the middle of 2018. <br />Commissioner Jacobs referred to signage, and said they are stipulated as being externally <br />illuminated rather than internally illuminated in District II. He asked if there is a reason why this is <br />preferable. <br />Michael Harvey said he may have to gather that information, and answer this question <br />later. <br />Commissioner Jacobs referred to the issue of trees, and asked if there is any kind of tree <br />preservation plan for the interior of these sites. <br />Michael Harvey said there is no tree survey, but there are mandatory buffers, and the <br />developer plans to preserve existing foliage within those buffers. <br />Michael Harvey referred to page 110, which states, “unless otherwise specified herein, <br />signs shall be composed of internally lit letters.” He said he will review all documents to make <br />sure internally lit lights are included, as opposed to externally lit. <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked if it can be required that sign lighting be extinguished when <br />businesses closed. <br />Michael Harvey said this question can be posed to the Applicant. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said he would like to have a conversation about a tree survey for <br />this project. <br />Commissioner Jacobs referred to the buffers, and said it appears that thinning could leave <br />54 trees per acre. <br />Michael Harvey said that is the Developer’s proposal to encourage the BOCC to approve <br />thinning, but what he is hearing is that Jim Parker would like to revise this to address concerns <br />raised by the community about clearing. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said this is true except in one area, District III, and he would like to <br />address this area too. He said the 54-tree per acre proposal only leads to one tree per 741 <br />square feet. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said he has concerns about the traffic plan, as there is no clarity <br />about any internal circulation plans in either District I or II. He said this would be useful <br />information for the BOCC to have before giving its approval, as it will have an effect on how Old <br />86 will operate. <br />Michael Harvey said part of the confusion is that the TIA still references District III as <br />being developed. He said right now, there is one central entrance proposed into District II, and <br />District I would get access from the existing service road. <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked if a light would not be proposed at Davis Road if there is no <br />residential. <br />Jim Parker said that is correct. He said the light at Davis Road would be specifically for <br />District III. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said Davis Road will become a de facto thoroughfare. He said <br />whether a light is needed will not be determined by residential development, but by the change in <br />traffic patterns. <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked if Hillsborough has a water reuse system. <br />Michael Harvey said he did not know. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said he does not think Hillsborough has one, and suggested asking <br />the Developer to have a rain collection system, as a way to do irrigation. <br />Jim Parker said with the stormwater requirements, there is available water that can be <br />used for the landscape irrigation. He said there are also drought resistant requirements for <br />landscaping. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said to see if there is adequate water from the storm water <br />collection, which can dry up, or some kind of rain collection system. <br />Commissioner Jacobs referred to District II, which is noted to be “neighborhood, mixed <br />use, future land use.” <br />50