Browse
Search
5-a - Zoning Atlas Amendment - Conditional Zoning – Master Plan Development Conditional Zoning District (MPD-CZ) Settlers Point
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2018
>
Agenda - 01-23-2018
>
5-a - Zoning Atlas Amendment - Conditional Zoning – Master Plan Development Conditional Zoning District (MPD-CZ) Settlers Point
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2018 4:53:14 PM
Creation date
1/19/2018 4:48:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/23/2018
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5-a
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
174
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11 <br /> <br />nearly all parcels on Davis Rd. Removal of that buffer will degrade the homeowner <br />experience. <br />4. Visual aesthetic. The good news here is that most of this is completely under control of <br />the developer and the county. But I would hope that the design criteria would strike the <br />use of a 50ft 20x20 sign for District 2. Again, that would be wholly inappropriate for the <br />area. Old 86 is a scenic drive and the northern most part of that highway should have as <br />much protection as is possible from an aesthetic point of view. Likewise, Interstate 40 has <br />a very clear and clean visual aesthetic. Driving east from Efland where Interstate 40 splits <br />from Interstate 85, there is no signage of that size on the road until one arrives in Wake <br />County. Much care has been taken to remove standing billboards of any type from <br />intruding on the visual experience of the highway. The Interstate 40 corridor is, visually, <br />one of the nicest highways in state in this regard. In Orange County it has many aspects <br />of a boulevard and it should be kept that way. <br />I think that it is fair to say that most homeowners on Davis Rd, and in this area of the county, <br />view the exit at Interstate 40 and Old 86 as their entranceway to their homes. At present that <br />entrance way is rural and quiet. The county now wants to allow the placement of three large <br />developments literally right on our front steps. I cannot argue against development, but I would <br />hope that the county and the developers respect the character of the area. One only has to drive <br />west into Alamance County to visualize what I am most concerned with: another highway exit <br />built to satisfy transit economics but completely disrupting the character of the surrounding local <br />area. <br /> <br />Best regards <br />Matthew Kostura <br />4201 New Hope Springs Dr <br />Hillsborough, NC 27278 <br /> <br />Ronald Siebar reviewed the following comments: <br /> <br />Dear County Commissioners: <br />I strongly disagree with the actions taken so far in regard to the three parcels that make up the <br />proposed Settlers Point Development. <br />1. I find it appalling that not all of the members of the Planning Board had adequate time <br />to read the comprehensive proposal for this huge development before sending a <br />recommendation to the County Commissioners. This appears to be a "rush job" and to <br />whose benefit? <br />2. I object to any approval of District I tenants in the "warehouse district" <br />until ALL members of both commissions have been able to read the report and vote on <br />the proposed development. It doesn't make sense on such a big project to do <br />otherwise. <br />3. I object to the proposed rezoning of Districts II and III because the described districts do <br />not disclose what tenants or tenant mix is going to be present, nor do they adequately <br />take into account the water resources that Hillsborough will be asked to supply. I <br />understand that District III has been delayed until a later date; we need to delay the up- <br />zoning for properties in the proposed District II as well. <br />4. The proposed development of the districts does not adequately anticipate, and <br />therefore does not protect against, the adverse visual and aural impact of such a <br />development on the rural and residential neighborhoods that immediately surround it. At <br />the very least, the law of unintended (or overlooked) consequences will very likely <br />change the ambiance of this semi-rural community. Drastically. <br />The proposed development of District I will have a tremendously negative impact on the tree <br />buffer that now exists for the benefit of rural and residential properties along Davis Dr. to the west <br />of Old NC 86 because the proposed development abuts these properties. Clearing the tree buffer <br />will assault these residents with noise from the I-40 corridor that this district will flank. A <br />42
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.