5-a - Zoning Atlas Amendment - Conditional Zoning – Master Plan Development Conditional Zoning District (MPD-CZ) Settlers Point

Browse Search

Approved 11/01/2017 13 Lydia Wegman said that portion of the development being reviewed is not residential; it is light industrial and research in Distirct 1 and commercial/retail in District 2, not residential. These properties have been identified since the ‘80s and ‘90s that the County wanted to focus on for economic development. The current zoning is for economic development. Corinn Shaker commented that the Board still does not know definitely what will be developed in District 1 and 2; there could be a hotel or a restaurant or a pharmaceutical company. Lydia Wegman said that the Planning Board would not be able to approve any of that anyway. The Planning Department will be reviewing this. The provisions of the master plan allow for specifics to come in later. Corinn Shaker replied that she can understand that. She still just feels shocked that she did not know about the development. Why is the County not working to fix what is inside of Hillsborough before focusing out? Lydia Wegman responded that that would not be up to the Planning Board but rather individual developers and business owners. It is not the Board’s job to tell them where to go. Tony Blake agreed that this would be out of the Board’s scope. The Planning Board is an advisory board. Corinn Shaker said that she is just putting her concern out there about how Hillsborough is evolving over time. Tony Blake confirmed that Davis Rd. is in the County’s jurisdiction. He thanked Ms. Shaker for her comments. Joan Kalnitsky said that she also lives off of Davis Rd. Her concern is District 1 and the light industrial permitted uses described on pages 309-310. She is concerned about the noise. She tried to read the document but it was exhausting to read. She read that noise and light will be governed by County standards and she does not know what that means. There are over 70 homes in the Davis Road community mentioned earlier; it is a not a small community. Their community has consistently voted to keep it dark in terms of lighting enhancements. She said that even though residents there are not within 1,000 feet, they are within 1 mile of the proposed development. If the proposal goes through, the flavor of the area is going to change drastically. She wished that the community had been invited to the NIMs. She hopes that that Board will ask for more information on what light industrial uses are considered, which could potentially include a textile mill, which would change their lives dramatically. She asked the Board to consider her comments, to read over the packet thoroughly, ask more questions, and better understand the potential impact of unknown the light industrial uses. Tony Blake and Lydia Wegman looked to Michael Harvey for more information on light industrial uses that the speaker mentioned (referring to page 314). Michael Harvey said District 1 is, by its zoning designation, and as defined in the current UDO, a light industrial zoning district. He said that the County is currently revising its Table of Permitted Uses and that the Board has been participating in reimagining what the Hillsborough Economic Development Districts would be like, going back a year ago. The Planning Board and the elected officials recommended expanding the uses in general, including in this light industrial and research zoning district, EDH-5. The permitted uses listed in the application narrative are the same as those listed in the application. Tony Blake said he knows that the Table of Permitted Uses is being redone. Is it the case that if a use is not identified as an allowable use in a zoning district, it is permitted by default? Is this a state ruling? Michael Harvey said yes, Mr. Blake is referring to a state court ruling. Tony Blake asked if the master planning process protects the area better than what the Table of Permitted Uses lists. 23