Orange County NC Website
9 <br /> Commissioner Rich asked if there is any other example in Orange County where a <br /> developer has had to work directly with the utility to get an agreement. <br /> Michael Harvey said in the Buckhorn area, Ashwick subdivision, Durham Economic <br /> Development District (EDD). <br /> Commissioner Rich said she those are all projects on which the County is working. She <br /> said she is asking for examples where the Developer actually has to work directly with the Town. <br /> Craig Benedict said Mebane and Durham have agreed to provide service to uses <br /> consistent with the coordinated plan. He said in Hillsborough the only agreement is on the SW <br /> quadrant. He said a larger zone has not been identified, with which Hillsborough has been in <br /> agreement. He said in the other two districts, there is a utilities service map, and both Mebane <br /> and Durham have agreed to serve and maintain water and sewer utilities if the projects come <br /> forward. <br /> Chair Dorosin said asked to be shown where the access road is on the map, which <br /> Michael Harvey provided. <br /> Chair Dorosin asked what would happen, if there were future interest in developing District <br /> 3. He asked if this would have to start from scratch. <br /> Michael Harvey said the Applicant would bring it back, conduct another neighborhood <br /> meeting, and another public hearing. <br /> Chair Dorosin asked if such a proposal would be subject to a whole new set of conditions <br /> and review. <br /> Michael Harvey said that is correct, and none of the conditions contained in attachment 11 <br /> deal with District III. <br /> Chair Dorosin said for the purposes of this discussion, it is as though District III is severed. <br /> Michael Harvey said yes. <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner Burroughs, seconded by Commissioner McKee to <br /> open the public hearing. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> PUBLIC COMMENT: <br /> Mayor Tom Stevens said he is here with the perspective of the Board of the Town of <br /> Hillsborough, who adopted a vision and comprehensive plan as a guide for development about <br /> ten years ago. He said this plan has developed with input of citizens and County government, <br /> and recognizes increasing development pressure, and the constraints due to water and sewer. <br /> He said the plan can be summarized as avoiding sprawl in to the countryside; by making the best <br /> use of road infrastructure; and steering development towards live/work/play communities between <br /> the Eno River and Interstate 40. He said there are three important themes that continue to run <br /> through the development plan: <br /> • Retaining 40% commercial tax base <br /> • Emphasizing a built environment that is town-like <br /> • Emphasizing high levels of connectivity <br /> He said his desire tonight is to show how that plan reflects on this project. He said the <br /> Town fully supports the commercial development of the EDD; the Town is opposed to any <br /> residential development in this area; and the type of commercial use in the EDD matters, and <br /> how it gets approved matters. He said much of what is proposed in this application is in <br /> agreement with the Town's coordinated area plan, but there are some significant parts that are <br /> not. He said the plan calls for employment uses on the west side of Old 86, and mixed use and <br /> suburban office on the east side. He said in Hillsborough's definitions, the opportunity for retail is <br /> limited and somewhat small. He said District I is completely consistent with the Town's <br /> coordinated area plan, but District II contains some items that are inconsistent with this plan. He <br /> said the retail component is much larger than the Town would envision, and the Town is <br /> concerned that the quick and easy green space for an extended amount of retail could damage <br /> the overall retail viability of other areas of Hillsborough. <br />