Orange County NC Website
5 <br /> o Landscape plans are required to detail how vegetation will be cared for. <br /> • Landscaping: <br /> o District 1 has to maintain a 100 ft. buffer along western and southern <br /> property lines, <br /> o A 50 ft. buffer is proposed for Old NC Highway 86 <br /> — STAFF COMMENT— thinning will be allowed with a requirement for <br /> replanting. <br /> o Major Transportation Corridor(MTC) Overlay preserved along the <br /> Interstate (i.e. 100 ft. buffer) <br /> — STAFF COMMENT— thinning and breaks in this vegetation has <br /> been requested to allow for utility, stormwater, and parking <br /> development. After conferring with the Director, staff believes the <br /> request is reasonable as there is a replanting requirement <br /> associated with this provision. <br /> o Interior buffers proposed for parking lots, in front of buildings, etc. <br /> • Standards proposed for building architecture (i.e. materials buildings can be constructed <br /> of) including: Hardi-plank, Brick/Stucco, Concrete, etc. <br /> • Transportation: <br /> o Project shall comply with Section 6.10 Roadway Improvements and Multi- <br /> modal Transportation of the UDO. <br /> o External roadway improvements shall be constructed in accordance with <br /> NC Department of Transportation requirements. <br /> o Internal roads will be public roads. <br /> o Sidewalks and bicycle lanes will be developed. <br /> o Four(4) bus pullouts/transit shelters shall be constructed. <br /> • Land Uses: <br /> o District 1 includes manufacturing and research land uses (i.e. <br /> computers/electronics, pharmaceutical, metal products, furniture, <br /> food/beverage manufacturing, research facilities, etc.) <br /> o District 2 includes commercial/service uses (i.e. retail, professional offices, <br /> restaurants, recreational land uses, heath services such as doctors'offices, <br /> hotel/motel, motor vehicle service station—gas station, etc.) <br /> • Signage: <br /> o Architectural Landmark— Providing the visual identifier for the <br /> development. The primary location will take advantage of the topography to <br /> give visual guidance for motorist along the interstate. This would appear to <br /> be more of an architectural feature than a sign. <br /> — STAFF COMMENT: Staff and Planning Board have requested <br /> an example. Proposal calls for 50 ft. tall structure with <br /> approximately 400 sq.ft. of sign area. <br /> o Entry Portal Marker—providing the name of the development and <br /> identifying the names of major tenants. These signs are primarily intended <br /> for location at the main entrances to the project. <br /> — STAFF COMMENT: Staff and Planning Board have requested <br /> an example. Proposal calls for 8 signs with 300 sq.ft. of sign <br /> area. <br /> Staff Comments: <br /> • The application deemed complete. <br /> • Proposal appears consistent with the various goals outlined within the Comprehensive <br /> Plan. <br /> • Applicant provided a basic environmental assessment as part of this submittal. Staff has <br /> reviewed and determined there ought to be no significant environmental impact(s) from <br /> this project. <br />