Browse
Search
Minutes 11-14-2017
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2017
>
Minutes 11-14-2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/6/2017 7:05:17 AM
Creation date
12/6/2017 7:02:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/14/2017
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 11-14-2017 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2017\Agenda - 11-14-2017 - QPH
Agenda - 11-14-2017 - D.1 - Zoning Atlas Amendment: Conditional Zoning —Master Plan Development
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2017\Agenda - 11-14-2017 - QPH
Agenda - 11-14-2017 - D.2 - Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) and Zoning Atlas Amendments – Flood
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2017\Agenda - 11-14-2017 - QPH
Agenda - 11-14-2017 - D.3 - Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Amendments - Revisions to the Public Hearing Process
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2017\Agenda - 11-14-2017 - QPH
ORD-2017-023 Ordinance amending the Orange County Zoning Atlas - Settler's Point
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2017
ORD-2017-024 Ordinance amending the Zoning Atlas by eliminating the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) Overlay District as currently depicted on the atlas encumbering the identified parcels of property
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2017
ORD-2017-025 Ordinance adopting amendments to its UDO to make desired revisions to the existing public hearing process for review of UDO, Comprehensive Plan, and Zoning Atlas-related items
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2017
ORD-2017-026 Ordinance adopting a new Flood Insurance Study (FIS) and new Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) as produced by the State of NC and FEMA
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
10 <br /> Janet Marks lives in New Hope Springs off of Davis Road, and she has heard nothing of <br /> economic development over the years. She said she knows she cannot prevent the <br /> development. She said there will be little buffering to prevent light pollution, and asked if the <br /> Board would look at this issue closely. She asked the BOCC if it would look at the installation of <br /> water pipes in the District II area that is supposed to be for District I. <br /> Joan Kalnitsky said she is concerned with what will go into District 1. She said she hoped <br /> that the BOCC would wait until it is clear what is going to be in District I before voting on this <br /> project, and she has a signed petition supporting this concern. <br /> Matt Kostura reviewed the following comments: <br /> To the Orange County Board of Commissioners: <br /> I am writing to register my deep reservations regarding the planned development of the Settler's <br /> Point Master Planned Development Conditional Zoning (MPC-CZ) application <br /> My review of the narrative for the development and my concerns are based on three <br /> straightforward assertions: <br /> 1. The entire development is predicated on access to Interstate 40 with little integration into <br /> the surrounding community and because of that... <br /> 2. The rural residential look and feel of the area will be greatly compromised by certain types <br /> of development that are allowed by the current zoning permits and therefore.... <br /> 3. Inappropriate development will have a material impact on many more residents than those <br /> abutting the property and within the 1000 ft. spec for notification. <br /> Based on the narrative, District 1 will be the first tract developed for so-called light industrial, <br /> research or warehouse use. Of the three uses I list here I would hope that the county could <br /> concede the point that warehousing would be inappropriate. Certainly a light manufacturing <br /> facility; e.g.: the Morinaga facility or perhaps a local microbrewery or distillery that could use <br /> expansion. Even a food preparation facility to allow local farmers to process foods for local <br /> restaurants would be better than the standard warehouse. <br /> District 2 is yet another cookie cutter hotel, chain restaurants and high intensity retail/office <br /> complex. Perhaps there might be demand for a hotel in the area, but does the county want to <br /> become saddled with idle restaurant property in the near future? Casual dining as a category is <br /> doing poorly, with a change in drinking and eating habits. Local pubs with microbrews and <br /> restaurants with locally authentic food are in and corporate fast food is out. And frankly <br /> Hillsborough itself is establishing itself as something of a destination for both so would it not be <br /> reasonable to attract those types of clients or better still attempt to get some of the transit traffic <br /> on 40 into those same local restaurants? <br /> District 3 requires a rezoning of R1 land. The Settlers Ridge Properties have never sold and for <br /> good reason; they are too close to the highway and the noise in that area is fairly high. No one <br /> wants to build a $400K home next to a highway. So instead, a mixed use office high density <br /> housing complex (read apartments) and a lower density senior living complex are planned. <br /> I can see four major problems with this development that if not appropriately configured will <br /> absolutely wreck the surrounding area which is entirely rural residential in character. The <br /> concerns really come down to traffic, lights, noise and visual aesthetic. <br /> 1. Traffic would be a major problem on Old 86 and likely back on to Davis Rd, which would <br /> ultimately have a cut through to allow alternate access to the parcels. <br /> 2. Lighting is a concern with many homeowners in the area that appreciate dark skies. That <br /> is a quintessential part of the character of the area. Again, some types of developments <br /> (eg office or research) can mitigate these problems but others virtually demand intrusive <br /> lighting (gas stations, restaurants, warehousing). Standing lights are a concern. <br /> 3. Noise. More traffic, more noise and not much more needs to be said in that regard. Also <br /> the wooded areas provide a near complete buffer for traffic noise from Interstate 40 for <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.