Agenda - 12-04-2017 - 8-a - Minutes

Browse Search

10 1 not. He said the plan calls for employment uses on the west side of Old 86, and mixed use and 2 suburban office on the east side. He said in Hillsborough's definitions, the opportunity for retail 3 is limited and somewhat small. He said District I is completely consistent with the Town's 4 coordinated area plan, but District I I contains some items that are inconsistent with this plan. 5 He said the retail component is much larger than the Town would envision, and the Town is 6 concerned that the quick and easy green space for an extended amount of retail could damage 7 the overall retail viability of other areas of Hillsborough. 8 Janet Marks lives in New Hope Springs off of Davis Road, and she has heard nothing of 9 economic development over the years. She said she knows she cannot prevent the 10 development. She said there will be little buffering to prevent light pollution, and asked if the 11 Board would look at this issue closely. She asked the BOCC if it would look at the installation of 12 water pipes in the District II area that is supposed to be for District I. 13 Joan Kalnitsky said she is concerned with what will go into District 1. She said she 14 hoped that the BOCC would wait until it is clear what is going to be in District I before voting on 15 this project, and she has a signed petition supporting this concern. 16 Matt Kostura reviewed the following comments: 17 18 To the Orange County Board of Commissioners: 19 I am writing to register my deep reservations regarding the planned development of the 20 Settler's Point Master Planned Development Conditional Zoning (MPC-CZ) application 21 My review of the narrative for the development and my concerns are based on three 22 straightforward assertions: 23 1. The entire development is predicated on access to Interstate 40 with little integration into 24 the surrounding community and because of that... 25 2. The rural residential look and feel of the area will be greatly compromised by certain 26 types of development that are allowed by the current zoning permits and therefore.... 27 3. Inappropriate development will have a material impact on many more residents than 28 those abutting the property and within the 1000 ft. spec for notification. 29 30 Based on the narrative, District 1 will be the first tract developed for so-called light industrial, 31 research or warehouse use. Of the three uses I list here I would hope that the county could 32 concede the point that warehousing would be inappropriate. Certainly a light manufacturing 33 facility; e.g.: the Morinaga facility or perhaps a local microbrewery or distillery that could use 34 expansion. Even a food preparation facility to allow local farmers to process foods for local 35 restaurants would be better than the standard warehouse. 36 37 District 2 is yet another cookie cutter hotel, chain restaurants and high intensity retail/office 38 complex. Perhaps there might be demand for a hotel in the area, but does the county want to 39 become saddled with idle restaurant property in the near future? Casual dining as a category is 40 doing poorly, with a change in drinking and eating habits. Local pubs with microbrews and 41 restaurants with locally authentic food are in and corporate fast food is out. And frankly 42 Hillsborough itself is establishing itself as something of a destination for both so would it not be 43 reasonable to attract those types of clients or better still attempt to get some of the transit traffic 44 on 40 into those same local restaurants? 45 46 District 3 requires a rezoning of R1 land. The Settlers Ridge Properties have never sold and for 47 good reason; they are too close to the highway and the noise in that area is fairly high. No one 48 wants to build a $400K home next to a highway. So instead, a mixed use office high density 49 housing complex (read apartments) and a lower density senior living complex are planned. 50 I can see four major problems with this development that if not appropriately configured will 51 absolutely wreck the surrounding area which is entirely rural residential in character. The 52 concerns really come down to traffic, lights, noise and visual aesthetic. 53 1. Traffic would be a major problem on Old 86 and likely back on to Davis Rd, which would 54 ultimately have a cut through to allow alternate access to the parcels.