Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-27-2006-9b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2006
>
Agenda - 06-27-2006
>
Agenda - 06-27-2006-9b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 6:00:10 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 9:37:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/27/2006
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20060627
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2006
RES-2006-063 Consideration of a Resolution on District Elections for the Board of County Commissioners for a Nov 2006 Referendum
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LAW OFFICES <br />COLEMAN, CLEDHIL.L., NARGRAVE &. PEEK <br />APROFESSIONAL CORPORATION <br />129E TRYON STREET' <br />P. O. DRAWER 1529 <br />HILLSBOROUGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27278 <br />919~732~2196 <br />FAX 919732-7997 <br />www.cRandh com <br />Barry Jacobs, Chair <br />Moses Carey, Jr. <br />Valerie P, Foushee <br />Alice M. Gordon <br />Stephen Halkiotis <br />Orange County Board <br />Post Office Box 8181 <br />Hillsborough, North <br />May 1, 2006 <br />of CommissiwTers <br />Carolina 27278 <br />i~ <br />FROhf THE DESK OF <br />GEOFFREY E.GLEDHILL <br />E-MAIL: grnRrcypJdWli~cg+nJh.com <br />RE: Modification in the Structure of the Orange County <br />Board of Commissioners <br />Dear Board Members: <br />The latest consideration of a plan to modify the structure <br />of the Board of Commissioners was considered by you on April 18, <br />2006. At that meeting the Board voted to move forward with <br />"Proposal B," a seven member map and plan with one member from <br />District 1 (all of the County except Chapel Hill Township), two <br />members from District- 2 (Chapel Hill Township) and four at-large <br />members. The plan favored by the Board would have the qualified <br />voters of each district nominate candidates who reside in the <br />district for seats apportioned to that district and have the <br />qualified voters of the entire County elect all of the members <br />of the Board. "Proposal B" was reviewed by me before it was <br />presented to the Board for consideration. <br />While drafting a resolution of the: Board calling for a <br />referendum on "Proposal B," I checked it for cc•mpliance with <br />N.C, Gen. Stat. ~ 153A-58, part of the law authorizing a Board <br />of Commissioner called referendum to cYlange Board structure. <br />N.C. Gen. Stat. ~ 153A-58 does not authorize the Board to put <br />before the voters a structure alteration which contains a <br />combination of districts and at-large seats unless "no more than <br />half the Board [is] apportioned to the county at-large." Since <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.