Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-20-2017 - 8-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2017
>
Agenda - 11-20-2017 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 11-20-2017 - 8-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2017 3:45:39 PM
Creation date
11/16/2017 3:45:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/20/2017
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8a
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6 <br /> <br /> 1 <br />UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE 2 <br />Conditional Use Districts- Better option (Conditional Zoning) already exists in the UDO; 3 <br />both the North Carolina Bar Association and the University of North Carolina, School of 4 <br />Government has recommended that the legislature repeal Conditional Use District 5 <br />authority for multiple reasons. The legislature is currently working on this. It is unduly 6 <br />burdensome to applicants and County staff. It requires a legislative rezoning AND a 7 <br />quasi-judicial hearing. Everything that may be accomplished in a Conditional Use District 8 <br />may be accomplished through Conditional Zoning. 9 <br /> 10 <br />• “A conditional use district rezoning is initiated when the owner asks for a rezoning 11 <br />to a new zoning district that does not have any automatically permitted uses, only 12 <br />uses allowed by the issuance of a conditional use permit. In the usual conditional 13 <br />use district rezoning process, the owner applies for a special or conditional use 14 <br />permit for a particular project at the same time the rezoning is requested and the 15 <br />two decisions (the rezoning and the permit) are considered in a single 16 <br />proceeding.” (UNC School of Government) 17 <br />• “This is different from a conditional use district in that there is no accompanying 18 <br />conditional use permit. All of the site specific standards and conditions 19 <br />(sometimes including a site plan) are incorporated into the zoning district 20 <br />regulations.” (UNC School of Government) 21 <br /> 22 <br />The Board agreed for John Roberts to begin the repeal to planning board and staff. 23 <br /> 24 <br />Reduce the number of land uses - Planning is currently rewriting the Table of Permitted 25 <br />Uses, so this is the best time to reduce the number of land uses. Examples for cleanup: 26 <br />No need for distinctions between Bed & Breakfast, Bed & Breakfast Inn, Country Inn, 27 <br />Residential Hotel, Rooming House, etc. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Commissioner Price asked if an Airbnb could go in here. 30 <br />John Roberts said yes it could be here, either within an existing group or as one 31 <br />of its own. 32 <br />Chair Dorosin asked if, referring to his example, there is a difference in all of 33 <br />these, and if the purpose is to have fewer uses and broader definition. 34 <br />John Roberts said yes. 35 <br />Chair Dorosin said an existing Country Inn would still have a category under 36 <br />which it would fall, but it may be a new umbrella term. 37 <br />John Roberts gave the example that bed and breakfast and bed and breakfast inn 38 <br />could be combined into one category with an either/or definitional structure; and country 39 <br />inn, residential hotel and rooming house could be combined into another category with a 40 <br />separate either/or definitional structure. He said these changes will make this easier to 41 <br />read for the applicants. He said every use should be covered as much as possible, but it 42 <br />can be better categorized. 43 <br /> 44 <br />The Board agreed by consensus for John Roberts to proceed with the amendment. 45 <br /> 46 <br />GENERAL ORDINANCES 47 <br /> 48 <br />Chapter 1 49 <br />Penalties- The Board indicated it may not be comfortable with violations of county 50 <br />ordinances resulting in a $500 fine and 30 days in jail. Reducing the penalties here will 51 <br />reduce the penalties for all those ordinances that don’t have a specific penalty included 52 <br />within their terms. 53
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.