Orange County NC Website
4 <br /> <br />Commissioner Marcoplos said he would put a three-year term limit on positions, 1 <br />and make it retroactive. 2 <br />Commissioner Price agreed that they need a process, and to continue to keep 3 <br />one board (either one of choice, or due to being an officer) for however long. 4 <br />Commissioner Rich said she liked Chair Dorosin’s proposal. She said if the first 5 <br />round is open, it may take care of the term limits. She agreed with having a process. 6 <br />Commissioner Jacobs said he does not feel that strong about any of this. 7 <br />Chair Dorosin said this proposal is forcing the BOCC to do something different. 8 <br />He said if term limits are imposed, it should be two years. He said that ‘no saves’ 9 <br />produces the outcome that Commissioner Jacobs provided. 10 <br />Commissioner McKee said he still does not see a problem, but rather a solution 11 <br />searching for a problem. He said the existing process is good, and term limits would be 12 <br />fine, but he does not know what the problem is. He said this seems like change for the 13 <br />sake of change. 14 <br />Chair Dorosin said he disagrees, and there are people in the same positions for 15 <br />years, which limits the exposure and engagement of other BOCC members. 16 <br />Commissioner McKee said throwing the process wide-open limits the continuity. 17 <br />Commissioner Price agreed with Commissioner McKee. 18 <br />Chair Dorosin said the current process, having one Commissioner potentially 19 <br />serving on the same board for years on end, is not collectively good for Orange County. 20 <br />Commissioner Price said she would like to pick at least one to keep. 21 <br />Commissioner Jacobs said he does not really see what the problem is, but he 22 <br />understands what Chair Dorosin is trying to achieve. He said he would prefer having an 23 <br />option to have a conversation about giving up boards that are picked. 24 <br />Commissioner Rich said part of this conversation was raised by Commissioner 25 <br />Jacobs due to Commissioner Gordon being on the Metropolitan Planning Organization 26 <br />(MPO) for 18 years, which led to the rest of BOCC having no understanding of the MPO. 27 <br />Commissioner Jacobs said he agrees that a Commissioner should not serve on 28 <br />the same board for that many years. 29 <br />Commissioner Rich asked if Commissioner Jacobs is seeking open dialogue, and 30 <br />if this would be effective. She said this current BOCC may be able to talk openly, but not 31 <br />all Boards can. 32 <br />Commissioner Jacobs said if a term limit is added, this problem could be 33 <br />addressed. 34 <br />Commissioner Price asked if there is a reason that the BOCC cannot trade 35 <br />between the work session and the official vote. 36 <br />Chair Dorosin said it should be done in an open meeting in the interest of 37 <br />transparency 38 <br />Chair Dorosin said there are several options, which could be combined: 39 <br />• Option A – His proposed process: wide open in round one; no saves; and pick as 40 <br />you like thereafter. 41 <br />• Option B – keep the current process 42 <br />• Option C – modified current process: one save only (whether an officer or not) 43 <br />• Option D – add term limits 44 <br />• Option E – one save; instead of going around the circle, go down the list of 45 <br />boards to see who is interested. If more than one Commissioner is interested 46 <br />then have discussion or decide via a vote. 47 <br /> 48 <br />Commissioner Rich said option E could become very personal. 49 <br />Commissioner McKee said he would support option C with the addition of term 50 <br />limits. 51 <br />Commissioner Marcoplos said he agrees, and would want to make the term limits 52 <br />retroactive. 53