Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-27-2006-7b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2006
>
Agenda - 06-27-2006
>
Agenda - 06-27-2006-7b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 6:00:34 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 9:37:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/27/2006
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20060627
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8 <br />175 Scott Radway: The median can be as valuable as the mean, Is the mean/average for <br />176 Chapel Hill and Hillsborough inclusive or exclusive of the conservation easements in the <br />177 municipalities? <br />178 <br />179 Hervey McIver: In the open market, these numbers are meaningless. <br />180 <br />181 Technical Memo <br />182 <br />18.3 Vicki Bott: What are the findings? The section relating to density bonuses needs to be <br />184 revised based on recent conversations with Geoff Gledhill. An immediate transfer of <br />185 credits is required, there will be no TDR bank, We also need to review the language on <br />186 the section based on Payment-In-Lieu park fees. <br />187 <br />188 Geoff Gledhill: There is some question if a local government can contract (police <br />189 power). Orange County has solved this by having joint planning authority. The County <br />190 has permission from the State for interlocal agreements, <br />191 <br />192 Brian Dobyns: Would it make the program more feasible if Chapel Hill could be <br />19.3 involved in the Rural Buffer? <br />194 <br />195 Geoff Gledhill: That's not a legal question. <br />196 <br />197 Vicki Bott: Technically, with the ETJ's, Chapel Hill does little planning in Chapel Hill <br />198 Township. <br />199 <br />200 Scott Radway: This is a conceptual framework, The Chapel Hill land ordinance <br />201 includes these provisions already. <br />202 <br />20.3 Geoff Gledhill: Correct. Chapel Hill has Resources Conservation Districts in place, <br />204 which is essentially a TDR program, <br />205 <br />206 Scott Radway: What if you are in a receiving area, and want to transfer land <br />207 development rights to a neighbor, Can a receiving area property sell the credits to <br />208 another receiving area property, such as in historic districts? <br />209 <br />210 Vicki Bott: That can be incorporated into the design. You can specify areas where you <br />211 would like this encouraged. <br />212 <br />213 Scott Lane: What would be the motivation to buy another receiving area property? <br />21.4 <br />215 Scott Radway: I may want to get the best deal passible. <br />216 <br />217 Vicki Bott: The maps are not a decision at this point. <br />218 <br />219 Renee Price-Saunders: The Historic Preservation Gommission has already expressed <br />220 an interest in having certain areas carved out, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.