Browse
Search
ORD-2017-026 Ordinance adopting a new Flood Insurance Study (FIS) and new Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) as produced by the State of NC and FEMA
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2010-2019
>
2017
>
ORD-2017-026 Ordinance adopting a new Flood Insurance Study (FIS) and new Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) as produced by the State of NC and FEMA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2019 11:03:41 AM
Creation date
11/15/2017 11:54:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/14/2017
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
D.2
Document Relationships
2017-628 Statement of Approval and Consistency Of A Proposed Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment With the Adopted Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Contracts and Agreements\General Contracts and Agreements\2010's\2017
2017-629 Statement of Approval and Consistency Of A ProposedZoning Atlas Amendment with the Adopted Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Contracts and Agreements\General Contracts and Agreements\2010's\2017
Agenda - 11-14-2017 - D.2 - Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) and Zoning Atlas Amendments – Flood
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2017\Agenda - 11-14-2017 - QPH
Minutes 11-14-2017
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Article 6: Development Stand <br /> Section 6.21: Flood Regulations <br /> (4) Have provided all Base Flood Elevation (BFE) data : e•.e-: _-.- __ •- <br /> _--_ - -- -e e - e -- - . --- ' -- - - adopted by <br /> reference per Section 4.31.1.3 of this Ordinance.44 <br /> - - , • . <br /> accordance with the Table of Permitted Uses, if all of the following conditions arc <br /> met <br /> The use serves a critical need in the Orange County. <br /> No feasible location exists for the use outside the SFHA. <br /> The reference level e _ __ - - - -•- -e _ ___ _ __ __ _ <br /> - _ -_ , •- <br /> "T• _• •_ - - <br /> fact base: - • - - ••_• - - - ,e .--• - 's compliance with <br /> these <br /> (E) Effect Upon Outstanding Floodplain Development Permits <br /> Nothing herein contained shall require any change in the plans, construction, size, or <br /> designated use of any development or any part thereof for which a floodplain <br /> development_permit has been granted by the Floodplain Administrator or his/her <br /> authorized agents before the time of passage of this Ordinance; provided, however, that <br /> when construction is not begun under such outstanding permit within a period of six <br /> months subsequent to passage of this Ordinance or any revision thereto, construction or <br /> use shall be in conformity with the provisions of this Ordinance. <br /> (F) Enforcement <br /> The provisions of the SFHA Overta ict shall be enforced in accordance with the <br /> requirements contained within Section 9.7 of this Ordinance. <br /> as Staff is recommending we eliminate the identified unnecessary and conflicting language. All flood areas(i.e. <br /> SFHA)are required to be left undisturbed and protected by open space areas(i.e. primary open space in a <br /> subdivision). Further we require all applicable data for a project located on a property encumbered by SFHA. As a <br /> result providing some exemption from the requirement based on acreage/number of units is inconsistent with <br /> established regulations. <br /> 45 This section is recommended for deletion given staff's recommendation to prohibit development of <br /> solid/hazardous waste management facilities, salvage/junk yards, and chemical storage facilities within a SFHA. <br /> From our standpoint allowing for same is inconsistent with the overall purpose and intent of the County's <br /> floodplain management program. <br /> Orange County, North Carolina—Unified Development Ordinance Page 6-157 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.