Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-14-2017 - D.2 - Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) and Zoning Atlas Amendments – Flood
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2017
>
Agenda - 11-14-2017 - QPH
>
Agenda - 11-14-2017 - D.2 - Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) and Zoning Atlas Amendments – Flood
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/14/2017 2:52:30 PM
Creation date
11/14/2017 2:45:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/14/2017
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
D.3
Document Relationships
2017-628 Statement of Approval and Consistency Of A Proposed Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment With the Adopted Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Contracts and Agreements\General Contracts and Agreements\2010's\2017
2017-629 Statement of Approval and Consistency Of A ProposedZoning Atlas Amendment with the Adopted Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Contracts and Agreements\General Contracts and Agreements\2010's\2017
Minutes 11-14-2017
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2017
ORD-2017-024 Ordinance amending the Zoning Atlas by eliminating the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) Overlay District as currently depicted on the atlas encumbering the identified parcels of property
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2017
ORD-2017-026 Ordinance adopting a new Flood Insurance Study (FIS) and new Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) as produced by the State of NC and FEMA
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
230
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Article 6: Development Stand <br /> Section 6.21: Flood Regulations <br /> (4) Have provided all Base Flood Elevation (BFE) data : e•.e-: _-.- __ •- <br /> _--_ - -- -e e - e -- - . --- ' -- - - adopted by <br /> reference per Section 4.31.1.3 of this Ordinance.44 <br /> - - , • . <br /> accordance with the Table of Permitted Uses, if all of the following conditions arc <br /> met <br /> The use serves a critical need in the Orange County. <br /> No feasible location exists for the use outside the SFHA. <br /> The reference level e _ __ - - - -•- -e _ ___ _ __ __ _ <br /> - _ -_ , •- <br /> "T• _• •_ - - <br /> fact base: - • - - ••_• - - - ,e .--• - 's compliance with <br /> these <br /> (E) Effect Upon Outstanding Floodplain Development Permits <br /> Nothing herein contained shall require any change in the plans, construction, size, or <br /> designated use of any development or any part thereof for which a floodplain <br /> development_permit has been granted by the Floodplain Administrator or his/her <br /> authorized agents before the time of passage of this Ordinance; provided, however, that <br /> when construction is not begun under such outstanding permit within a period of six <br /> months subsequent to passage of this Ordinance or any revision thereto, construction or <br /> use shall be in conformity with the provisions of this Ordinance. <br /> (F) Enforcement <br /> The provisions of the SFHA Overta ict shall be enforced in accordance with the <br /> requirements contained within Section 9.7 of this Ordinance. <br /> as Staff is recommending we eliminate the identified unnecessary and conflicting language. All flood areas(i.e. <br /> SFHA)are required to be left undisturbed and protected by open space areas(i.e. primary open space in a <br /> subdivision). Further we require all applicable data for a project located on a property encumbered by SFHA. As a <br /> result providing some exemption from the requirement based on acreage/number of units is inconsistent with <br /> established regulations. <br /> 45 This section is recommended for deletion given staff's recommendation to prohibit development of <br /> solid/hazardous waste management facilities, salvage/junk yards, and chemical storage facilities within a SFHA. <br /> From our standpoint allowing for same is inconsistent with the overall purpose and intent of the County's <br /> floodplain management program. <br /> Orange County, North Carolina—Unified Development Ordinance Page 6-157 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.