Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-14-2017 - D.2 - Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) and Zoning Atlas Amendments – Flood
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2017
>
Agenda - 11-14-2017 - QPH
>
Agenda - 11-14-2017 - D.2 - Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) and Zoning Atlas Amendments – Flood
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/14/2017 2:52:30 PM
Creation date
11/14/2017 2:45:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/14/2017
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
D.3
Document Relationships
2017-628 Statement of Approval and Consistency Of A Proposed Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment With the Adopted Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Contracts and Agreements\General Contracts and Agreements\2010's\2017
2017-629 Statement of Approval and Consistency Of A ProposedZoning Atlas Amendment with the Adopted Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Contracts and Agreements\General Contracts and Agreements\2010's\2017
Minutes 11-14-2017
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2017
ORD-2017-024 Ordinance amending the Zoning Atlas by eliminating the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) Overlay District as currently depicted on the atlas encumbering the identified parcels of property
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2017
ORD-2017-026 Ordinance adopting a new Flood Insurance Study (FIS) and new Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) as produced by the State of NC and FEMA
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
230
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Article 6: Development Standar <br /> Section 6.6:Additional Standards for Overlay Districts' <br /> 6&2s 6.1 Highway 70/ECOD <br /> ) Ingress and Egress <br /> The following standards shall regulate ingress and egress points within e corridor: <br /> (1) For purposes of determining the allowable number of ingress :nd egress points <br /> on any particular lot, all lots recorded at the effective date o his Ordinance shall <br /> be granted at least one ingress and egress point per road •ont unless access <br /> can be provided through some internal means. Howeve,, minimization of the <br /> total number of driveways along the Highway 70 corridor is desirable through the <br /> use of shared driveways or other access managemer techniques. <br /> (2) A trances/Exits <br /> (a) On all corner lots, no vehicular opening: shall be located closer than 60 <br /> feet from the point of intersection of t - street right-of-way lines. <br /> (b) o manage access on Highway 70 corner lots may be required to <br /> pr•vide ingress and/or egress fro► the adjacent street. <br /> (c) Entr. ces/exits shall not exce:: 36 feet in width measured at the <br /> prope line; however, in ins :nces where parking lots serve <br /> tractor/tr.:Her traffic, the driv-way entrance/exit may be increased to 40 <br /> feet in wid . <br /> (d) Exits for par g faciliti: containing more than 36 parking spaces shall <br /> contain holdin• anes or left-turning and right-turning traffic unless the <br /> Planning Directo d: ermines that due to the physical features of a site, <br /> holding lanes wo be unsafe and in accordance with established traffic <br /> mitigation stand. ds, should not be required. <br /> (3) Multiple Curb Cut R:•uireme'ts <br /> (a) A lot fronti • on Highway 70 shall have a minimum of 600 feet of road <br /> frontage ong the street be ire two curb cuts are allowed, unless the <br /> project ' eets one of the folio ing criteria: <br /> (i) Any mixed-use develop ent where two curb cuts are approved <br /> as part of a Special Use '-rmit or Conditional District, as <br /> prescribed by the Board of ounty Commissioners. <br /> (ii) Shared Access <br /> a. In instances where a no residential land use is <br /> proposed next to another •n-residential land use and <br /> each of the contiguous non- -sidential land uses will <br /> have direct frontage along Hig,way 70, then the County <br /> shall require shared driveway c s for all such <br /> contiguous non-residential land u--s. <br /> b. In the event that shared driveway c s are required, then <br /> the owners of the contiguous parcels .hall execute <br /> reciprocal easement agreements betw--n the separate <br /> property owners and have the same reco ded in the <br /> Office of the Orange County Register of D--ds prior to <br /> the issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit. The <br /> easement agreement shall be sufficient to allo for the <br /> development of a service road to channel acces from <br /> Highway 70 to each property. Figure 6.6.2.A.3 shows an <br /> example of the shared access. <br /> Orange County, North Carolina—Unified Development Ordinance Page 6-28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.