Orange County NC Website
88 <br /> Randy Marshall said that he is ready to make a motion. <br /> Buddy Hartley said that this is as good an application that he has seen. Mr. Parker has covered about everything that <br /> needs to be covered. For the Board to make a recommendation on this, there is nothing that is not to approve. He <br /> said that the County does need senior housing somewhere. He said that he will be a senior someday too. <br /> Lydia Wegman asked if there were any additional comments. She thanked everyone for coming to the meeting to <br /> speak and thanked Mr. Parker and his team for coming, and to Michael Harvey and Craig Benedict for their help this <br /> evening. She said that from her perspective, she appreciated the applicant's willingness for continued discussions on <br /> the environmental and transportation assessments; this is is very important. That component is a plus of this <br /> application. She did hear concerns about transportation and she does hope that the developer and other businesses <br /> will work closely with members of the community on transportation and environmental concerns. She asked again if <br /> anyone else had additional comments. <br /> Michael Harvey said that if there is a consensus among Board members that the item be tabled until November, it is <br /> the Board's prerogative. If the decision is that there is a consensus to recommend this project, there are <br /> modifications that need to be made to Attachment 7. He will walk the Board member through making the motion on <br /> this part in order to address the Board's comments and to fix some items in the review that he did not catch earlier. <br /> He needs to ensure that the motion is consistent and clean to address all concerns from Board members, and <br /> modifications that ensure District 3 is eliminated from any review, point or discussion. <br /> Tony Blake clarified that Item C would include Attachment 7 as amended. <br /> Michael Harvey added that it would read "as amended and as further amended," if that is the decision to move <br /> forward. <br /> Lydia Wegman asked if any of the modifications would be relevant in the Board's thinking. <br /> Michael Harvey said that they could potentially be relevant. <br /> Lydia Wegman asked for Mr. Harvey to go through the modifications. <br /> Michael Harvey said that in Attachment 7, he will be applying the following notes. He heard from a Planning Board <br /> member tonight that in regards to Condition 4 regarding site plan approval (page 308) that references be included to <br /> local volunteer fire departments to review site plans. <br /> Tony Blake said that this would be for the primary responding volunteer fire department. <br /> Michael Harvey continued with his proposed modifications. He said that there would have to be explicit language <br /> saying that the Town of Hillsborough has to review and indicate if there is capacity for water and sewer service, prior <br /> to the County Planning Department issuing a site plan approval. On page 311, in Condition 6, the local volunteer fire <br /> department needs to be added to the Orange County Fire Marshall and Town of Hillsborough sharing review and <br /> approving location of fire lanes, location of fire hydrants, and location of proposed standpipes. The local volunteer fire <br /> department shall also be involved in the float test, which is now all in Condition 8. On page 315, for District 2, <br /> numbers 3 and 16 are for movie theaters. There only needs to be one movie theater so the recommendation would <br /> be to delete number 16 and renumber accordingly to correct the duplication. On 317, the condition (Condition H) <br /> regarding landscaping around the Major Transportation Corridor (MTC) Overlay District, a statement needs to be <br /> added to number one at the end to say, "unless clearing is consistent with Section 6.6.5 (a) of the UDO." The UDO <br /> does allow for breaks for visibility in the MTC. He said that there was some discussion that the BOCC receive a <br /> rendering or an example of the architectural landmark sign and an entry portal sign so that they can make a <br /> recommendation if the proposed square footage is acceptable. Mr. Harvey said that he did not hear the Board <br /> express concerns about the square footage of the signage, but everyone wants to see and understand what the <br />