Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-14-2017 - D.1 - Zoning Atlas Amendment: Conditional Zoning —Master Plan Development
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2017
>
Agenda - 11-14-2017 - QPH
>
Agenda - 11-14-2017 - D.1 - Zoning Atlas Amendment: Conditional Zoning —Master Plan Development
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/14/2017 2:50:16 PM
Creation date
11/14/2017 2:41:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/14/2017
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
D.1
Document Relationships
Minutes 11-14-2017
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2017
ORD-2017-023 Ordinance amending the Orange County Zoning Atlas - Settler's Point
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
76 <br /> Tony Blake said that the streamlining is clear. He wants to make sure that the people affected by the project have <br /> been listened to. <br /> Michael Harvey said that the applicant's gone to great lengths to alleviate concerns, as has Staff, by making <br /> conditions of approval that address concerns. Mr. Harvey said that unfortunately, nothing is perfect. However, the <br /> application represents a reasonable move forward in this area of the County, and as Staff continues to address <br /> external roadway improvements, ancillary agencies will have more ability to compel some modifications of roadways <br /> that may impact certain components of projects. <br /> Lydia Wegman acknowledged Paul Guthrie to speak. <br /> Paul Guthrie asked a couple of questions: Has there been a formal analysis on the capacity with potential increases <br /> for water and sewer?And to what level? <br /> Michael Harvey said that he will let the applicant answer that question. <br /> Paul Guthrie asked-Who is going to pay for the expansion of the facilities if Hillsborough takes on the responsibility? <br /> Will the water supply be from Hillsborough? <br /> Michael Harvey said that was not a question he could answer. <br /> Paul Guthrie asked about a transmission line about a block-and-a-half from the site. Have there been discussions <br /> with the power company about this line? <br /> Michael Harvey replied that no, there have not because no site plan has been submitted yet. While Staff knows there <br /> is service availability, it is currently unclear which use will be reviewed for approval first. It is incumbent upon the <br /> developer to make improvements on utilities for the good of the project, just like any developer in Orange County <br /> when it comes to utility upgrades. As site plans come-in, the Town of Hillsborough will decide if they can handle <br /> capacity,and if they cannot, the use cannot be approved. <br /> Paul Guthrie asked if the developer will pay for additional costs associated with this. <br /> Michael Harvey responded that if a developer wants utility upgrades for a project, they will have to pay for it. He <br /> cannot comment for the Town of Hillsborough. <br /> Paul Guthrie noted that there has been an interesting dialogue going on with Hillsborough on this project, as he read <br /> in the materials provided. <br /> Michael Harvey agreed and said that most of that dialogue is on District 3. Ms. Hauth's letter voicing concern over the <br /> Town serving a residential project this far south, outside the Town's corporate limits, is included in the materials given <br /> to the Board.These are the issues to discuss further. <br /> Paul Guthrie said that Hillsborough will have to weigh capacity of water needs/use based on what gets built on the <br /> site. <br /> Michael Harvey replied that applicants have to provide information for site plan review to figure out these very issues. <br /> Craig Benedict said that in regards to water capacity for District 1, the agreement that the County has with <br /> Hillsborough does have a certain allocation — 108,000 gallons/day. This is part of the agreement in that area. Any <br /> uses that come forward will have to spread-out over the 148 acres or so to accommodate the capacity. For other <br /> issues outside of District 1, District 2, and possibly District 3, there will have to be an independent agreement <br /> between Hillsborough and the developer to negotiate water and sewer consumption. The County is involved with the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.