Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-24-1992
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1992
>
Agenda - 08-24-1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2017 4:46:20 PM
Creation date
11/8/2017 4:39:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/24/1992
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
264
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
g? qaa <br />ALAN D GEIFERHELD <br />4304 POWDER MILL ROAD <br />CHAPEL HILL, NO 27514 <br />MOSES CAREY, CHAIRMAN <br />ORANGE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS- <br />ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT <br />306F REVERE ROAD <br />HILLSBOROUGH, NC 27278 | <br />DEAR MR. CAREY <br />% AM WRITING CONCERNING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT : <br />CP-1-92 UNIVERSITY STATION, AND WILL TELL YOU WHY I OBJECT TO <br />THIS PROPOSED AMENDMENT. <br />I PURCHASED MY LOT ON POWDER MILL ROAD AND SUBSEQUENTLY BUILT MY <br />HOME IN 1988 FOR ONE MAJOR REASON. THE RURAL SETTING. I MOVED <br />FROM CARY TO GET AWAY FROM THE URBAN ENVIRONMENT; TRAFFIC, NOISE, <br />CONGESTION, AND HIGH DENSITY NEIGHBORHOODS. <br />BEFORE BUYING MY LOT ON POWDER MILL ROAD, I LOOKED AT THE EXIST- <br />ING ZONING AND SAW THAT THE AREA WAS COMPRISED OF AGRICULTURAL <br />LAND AND RESIDENTIAL ZONING THAT PERMITS ONLY ONE HOME PER ACRE, <br />AND SINCE ALL LAND ISN'T SUITABLE FOR SEPTIC SYSTEMS, THE DENSITY <br />WOULD MORE THAN LIKELY BE LESS THAT ONE HOME PER ACRE. I BELIEVE <br />THAT MANY OF MY NEIGHBORS MOVED TO THIS AREA FOR SIMILAR REASONS. <br />--THE' PROPOSED- CHANGE INCREASES <br />ALLOWED ON THE PROPERTY TREME <br />LARGE PORTION OF THE PROPERTY <br />BRINGING IN WATER AND SEWER, <br />VELOPED, COULD BE DEVELOPED. <br />THE DENSITY OF HOUSING THAT IS <br />WDOUSLY, SINCE AS IT IS TODAY, A <br />CAN NOT BE DEVELOPED. ALSO, BY <br />-AND THAT PRESENTLY CAN'T BE DE- <br />I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE RURAL CHARACTER OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD <br />REMAIN AS IT 18. <br />THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. <br />SINCERELY, <br />ALAN D. SEIMHELD <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.