Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-24-1992
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1992
>
Agenda - 08-24-1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2017 4:46:20 PM
Creation date
11/8/2017 4:39:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/24/1992
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
264
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
S T ON EY CR E E K N E I GH S ORH O O D A S <br />3600 Bluestone Court Chapel Hill, NC <br />September 10, 1992 <br />Orange County Commissioners <br />c/o Ms. Beverly Blythe, County Offices <br />Hillsborough, NC 27278 <br />Dear Orange County Commission: <br />I am writing you on behalf of the Stoneycreek Neighborhood <br />Association to express our opposition to the proposed <br />University Station Project. <br />We fully realize that development is inevitable, and our group <br />will not summarily reject all proposals to build near our <br />homes. During a recent, well- attended meeting we carefully <br />considered the current proposal and its ramifications. All <br />present agreed that the attendant risks far outweigh the <br />advantages. <br />Obvious weaknesses of the proposal include: (1) the density is <br />too high, far in excess of guidelines advanced by the Rural <br />Character Committee and unacceptable to people living nearby; <br />(2) the town of Hillsborough, which would likely have <br />jurisdiction over the area, lacks the capacity to plan and <br />service such a large development; (3) the enormous impact on <br />area traffic has not been addressed; (4) the county's model <br />school might well end up serving a single, privileged <br />community; and (5) declaring the area "urban transitional" <br />could easily prove disastrous, enabling very high density <br />development if the current plan is later changed. <br />For these and other reasons, we strongly oppose the current <br />proposal. Please do not vote in favor of this plan, or any <br />other proposal that compromises the rural character of our <br />area. <br />Sincerely, <br />I 14"A_ <br />Bret C. Williams, MD <br />President, Stoneycreek Neighborhood <br />Association <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.