Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-24-1992
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1992
>
Agenda - 08-24-1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2017 4:46:20 PM
Creation date
11/8/2017 4:39:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/24/1992
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
264
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Peter M. Pickens <br />3004 Cool Spring Drive <br />Chapel Hill, NC 27514 <br />September 25, 1992 <br />Dear Members of the Orange County Board of <br />Commissioners: <br />Please vote against the proposed University Station <br />development which, unfortunately, was recently approved by <br />our seemingly pro - growth - oriented Orange County Planning <br />Board. I know there is water and sewer available now, but <br />this village golf course development is no more right for <br />Orange County today than the retirement golf course <br />development proposed on the same property in 1989 - which was <br />rejected btu you, hopefully because of your committment to the <br />good of maintaining a rural buffer between Hillsborough and <br />Chapel Hill. Surely you believe that this goal is just as <br />imperative now as it was then. And this newly proposed <br />development, despite its many lures, is even worse in concept <br />than the previous one, because it now includes not just high <br />density condos and apartments, but businesses and office <br />buildings as well. I believe that this proposed village golf <br />course development -if approved -would irreversably smear any <br />real distintion between urban and rural, commercial and <br />residential in this part of Orange County. As I wrote you <br />back in 1989, Ten Year Transition status for this huge <br />development is not a good idea and not in the best interests <br />of the health of Orange County. I hope you still agree. <br />Sincerely, 4'�� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.