Orange County NC Website
Public Hearing, CP -1 -92 University Station Land Use Plan Amendment <br />have been gaining favor with consumers. There are no schools mentioned <br />in the proposal, and although they suggest site set - asides for churches, <br />a day care center, community centers, and a light rail system, at what <br />point in the development timetable do these services become economically <br />viable? And, if and when competitive business services do become viable <br />within the subdivision, how many and what kind of jobs will be created? <br />This proposal does not create a "self- contained" community. <br />Traffic . <br />It seems a safe conclusion that a lot of trips will be made by the 3000 <br />or so residents commuting to and from their jobs, going to the store, <br />school, church. etc. during the 30 -year transition period. In addition, <br />any business activities that do occur within the proposed development <br />will no doubt employ people from outside the immediate neighborhood. <br />All of these trips will be taken on two roads: New Hope Church Road and <br />Old NC 10. Both of these roads are designated as major thoroughfares in <br />the transportation plan, but there is no plan for significant upgrades <br />to these roads. One must also ask if the additional growth in this area <br />risks resurrecting the plan for a northern Freeway with an interchange <br />at Old NC 10? <br />Economic Pressure. <br />Although the planned population density for this subdivision does not <br />reach critical mass to support business services within the "village" <br />until late in it's development timetable, the population growth will <br />create significant pressure to provide business services at <br />strategically located intersections within the surrounding rural area. <br />Likely locations for such pressure include the New Hope Church Road <br />intersections with I -40 and nC 86 and the University Station Road <br />intersections with Old NC 10 and US 70. Alternatively, if adequate <br />parking is provided within the "village," it may serve as a commercial <br />center for the surrounding areas. And, of course, once established, <br />whatever the growth patterns. they will not change. Even vigilant <br />elected officials, staff and citizenry may not successfully resist all <br />of the .plan change proposals that might arise from this proposal. In <br />reality, the proposed development risks creating urban sprawl rather <br />than protecting the rural character of the County. <br />Intent of the Plan_ <br />The proposed development does not comply with current open space <br />densities specified in the Plan. Even though it has not been approved <br />yet, we can also examine the intent of the current draft of the Rural <br />Character Study. Borrowing phrases from the Declaration of <br />Independence, the study committee makes a bold -- and laudable -- <br />attempt to find innovative ways to preserve the rural character of the <br />County and still protect and maintain the property rights of rural <br />landowners to profit from their real estate investments. But the studv <br />committee is also very cautious in their implementation recommendations. <br />