Agenda - 08-24-1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

499 ARTICLE 7 - SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION /PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS (Continued) PLANNING STAFF EVIDENCE SUBMITTED FINDINGS TO SUPPORT FINDINGS Ordinance Requirements a) 8. Maximum building height _X—Yes No complies with standards set forth in Article 6. 12.3 and Article 5.1.1. a) 7. Signs to be erected in _N /A_Yes No accordance with Article 9. Standards regarding "internal relationships" are as follows: b) 1. Streets, drives and parking _x —Yes No areas provide safe and convenient access for dwellings and emergency vehicles, and do not create small block sizes. b) 2. Vehicular access controlled as follows: a) Streets serving 50 or less _x —Yes No dwellings provide direct access to parking /service areas. b) Streets serving greater than _N /A_Yes No 50 dwellings provide access to parking areas so located, designed and controlled as to channel traffic without interruption. b) 3. Walkways form safe, convenient _x—Yes No system of access to dwellings, facilities and off -site designations. Maximum walking distance between dwellings and parking; delivery and refuse collection areas does not exceed 100 feet. Maximum building height in RB _ district is 25 feet. According to Article 8.2.1, a height of 2 additional feet are allowed for every foot of additional front and side setbacks provided. The proposed single family houses would meet the height requirements. There is no sign proposed. Heartwood Drive and Pathway Court will provide convenient access for dwellings and emergency vehicles. Each house will provide a drive and parking area. Not applicable. No system of walkways is shown except the trail easement in the common area. PLANNING BOARD FINDINGS Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No