Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-24-1992
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1992
>
Agenda - 08-24-1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2017 4:46:20 PM
Creation date
11/8/2017 4:39:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/24/1992
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
264
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
36 <br />_P <br />one unit /acre subdivision. In addition, the proposed park <br />dedication is consistent with the Parks and Recreation element <br />of the Comprehensive Plan. Both the extension of water and <br />sewer service and the proposed park are indicative of an area <br />in transition from rural agricultural to low density <br />residential. <br />4. Finally, a certain number of unknowns exist with a project the <br />scale of which has not been seen in this County. Concerns over <br />traffic impact, school enrollment, fire protection and the <br />integrity of Duke Forest are issues to consider. However, the <br />project which could evolve from this plan amendment also <br />offers a number of benefits to the area and the County as a <br />whole. The potential project would preserve open space, <br />provide a wildlife corridor, reduce the number of trips for <br />services, offer economic benefits to the region, and promote <br />an interactive social community with a variety of different <br />housing types. Mitigation measures such as buffers along the <br />perimeter of the site and park dedication can be applied to <br />the project in later phases, along with other conditions found <br />necessary to mitigate other impacts. Additionally, the change <br />in Land Use Element designation is not de facto zoning. If <br />there is a substantial change in the project at later stages <br />which compromises the goals and objectives of the Plan, the <br />Planned Development may be denied until it meets the purpose <br />and intent of the Plan. <br />16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.