Agenda - 08-03-1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

45 Attorney and he had responded that it is a procedural issue rather than substantive and he did not express concern. She continued that the intent of the two year provision in the ordinance could be reviewed in terms of the intent of this subdivision, and the decision based on this particular set of circumstances. Should such a situation occur again, it would be reviewed and judged on its own merit. MOTION: Jobsis moved to grant the applicant's appeal and classify this subdivision as a minor subdivision since it is a special case and the intent is not to create a large subdivision. Seconded by Scott. VOTE: Unanimous. AGENDA ITEM #10: MATTERS TO BE HEARD AT PUBLIC HEARING (8/24/92) 0 a. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT (1) Article 4.3 - Article 6.7.2 - Article 8.8.28 - Article 22 - Permitted Use Table Accessory Structures in Residential Districts Mobile /Manufactured Structure Definitions Presentation by Eddie Kirk. The Planning & inspections Staff has recently been presented with the issue of whether to allow mobile /manufactured structures to be used as accessory structures to residential uses. The Zoning Ordinance does not allow mobile homes to be used as accessory structures. whereas manufactured structures and mobile office structures are constructed differently than mobile homes and are not intended to be used as residential units, these types of structures differ from mobile homes and would be appropriate to use as accessory structures. This amendment would specifically set up mobile/ manufactured structures to be used for accessory purposes as a Class B Special Use Permit and provide specific standards that would apply in Agricultural Residential (AR), Rural Residential (R -1), and Rural Buffer (RB) zones. Utility buildings are currently allowed as accessory uses in residential districts and would not be affected by this amendment.