Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-03-1992
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1992
>
Agenda - 08-03-1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2017 4:43:32 PM
Creation date
11/8/2017 4:35:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/3/1992
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
425
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
15 <br />Mr. Marvin E. Collins <br />April 2¢x,21992 <br />Page Two <br />Conditions exist, just now, which will permit the development of the site as a rural village. <br />and secure the above benefits. These conditions include (a) options on the land (the last <br />large site in this part of the county which. can be assembled for such a project), (b) an <br />investor willing to commit $15 million to the project, (c) a professional team committed to <br />the rural village approach, and (d) a climate of opinion recognizing the validity of the <br />approach. <br />If there is a delay in considering the land use amendment until February, the options will <br />expire and some critical ones will not be able to be regained; for the same reason the <br />investor will no longer be interested, and the opportunity will be lost. <br />Six years ago a group of investors assembled the site, consisting of approximately 600 <br />acres of land. We thought it was the finest site available for a planned development <br />designed with housing and recreation in mind. It was outside the sensitive rural buffer and <br />watershed areas. <br />Two parcels consisting of 300 acres are owned by one family. A second family owns an <br />additional 159 acres and Mr. Don Lacefield owns the former Craig parcel. When the land <br />was originally purchased, Mr. Lacefield had three partners planning to combine theirs with <br />the 159 -acre parcel and develop it with wells and septic systems, but soil studies indicated <br />this was not the best approach for that particular site. <br />This became a serious problem for Mr. Lacefield. He has held onto his land although his <br />partners had to dissolve their relationship and left him with the full financial obligation. He <br />has talked with others about developing the land, but so long as there was the slightest <br />chance of University Station becoming a reality, he has delayed doing anything else. <br />Recently he has been under great pressure from the bank to resolve his situation with them. <br />Mr. Lacefield prefers to include his parcel for development with ours, and indeed, his land <br />is critical to the development of the rural'village proposed here. He is a long time <br />Hillsborough businessman and is concerned about the future of his part of the county. He <br />understands the benefits which will accrue from University Station, but very soon will be <br />forced to commit to another use for his property to avoid losing it altogether, despite the <br />fact that this will also destroy the conceptual plan for University Station by taking away the <br />only land topographically suitable for a portion of the village center. But the fact is, that by <br />February, he will will have done something else with his land. <br />Similar problems face all of the landowners who are under pressure from one circumstance <br />or another to do something else with their land, and the tenure of their options will also <br />become questionable after May. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.