Orange County NC Website
21 <br />compliance with all State and local regulations. The existing sewage <br />disposal system has a capacity of 4000 gallons per day and is regulated by <br />the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management. Based on the <br />State's standards, the potential system flow is 10 gallons per day per <br />student. Current daily flow is about 2400 gallons for 368 students, or 6.5 <br />gallons per student per day. Projected enrollment at Carolina Friends School <br />will not exceed 394 students. The resulting potential for a 3940 gpd flow <br />through the system is still within the 4000 gallon capacity permitted by DEM. <br />THERE WERE NO COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, <br />PLANNING BOARD OR CITIZENS. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Insko, second by Commissioner <br />Gordon, to refer this item to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be <br />returned to the Board of Commissioners on August 3rd, 1992. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />3. ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENTS <br />$. HOME OCCUPATIONS ARTICLES 6.16.6 AND 22 <br />This item was presented by Mary Scearbo for the purpose of <br />receiving citizen comments. This proposed zoning ordinance text amendment <br />will create more performance - oriented standards for home occupations. The <br />substantive changes proposed in the amendment pertain to setbacks and square <br />footage limits for accessory structures on lots larger than 200,000 square <br />feet (Article 6.16.6.3). The proposed standards would allow greater <br />flexibility in the location of home occupation accessory buildings if the <br />site contained wooded areas or topographic features which provided effective <br />screening. In contrast, the location of structures in open areas would be <br />more restricted in some instances. Other proposed changes involve the use <br />of large existing structures for home occupations activities. The amendment <br />was originated by the Planning Staff to address problem situations which have <br />been encountered in administering home occupation regulations. A recent <br />example involved a deep lot about 11 acres in size, with the residence <br />located almost 1000 feet from the road. Current regulations required the <br />home occupation structure to be located in an unsuitable location to the rear <br />of the residence. The desired location was in a wooded area, several hundred <br />feet from the road. The home_ occupation could not be approved, even though <br />the use would have been very heavily screened, and would not be visible from <br />the roadway. These proposed amendments begin a more comprehensive overhaul <br />of home occupation standards. The issues addressed at this time will resolve <br />situations which are more commonly encountered. Staff will be proposing in <br />a subsequent amendment changes to requirements for smaller lots, specific <br />standards related to traffic impacts, and additional standards for home <br />occupations which could potentially create nuisance impacts. <br />QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OR PLANNING BOARD <br />Commissioner Willhoit asked for clarification regarding the number <br />of persons who would be allowed to be employed in the home. Ms. Scearbo <br />indicated that the definition is interpreted to mean that two full -time <br />persons (FTP) may be employed at any one time. That could include part -time <br />positions equaling two full -time positions. <br />