Agenda - 08-03-1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

ARTICLE 7 - SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS Continued) PLANNING BOARD EVIDENCE SUBMITTED FINDINGS TO SUPPORT FINDINGS Ordinance Re uirements Walkways used as play areas _x_Yes or school routes by children located and designed to minimize contact with vehicular traffic. Crossings appropriately marked and safeguarded. b) 4. Protection of visibility - See a)3. and b)3, above. b) 5. Open space and spacing between _x—Yes buildings - See Article 8 standards. 16 x BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS FINDINGS No Since there is no through traffic, Yes No vehicle speeds are slow, allowing for safe pedestrian circulation. Most of the existing structures/ facilities are located on the west side of the entrance drive which minimizes pedestrian crossings. No Open space requirements are met. Yes No. No standards are provided in Article 8 for spacing between non - residential buildings. ARTICLE 5 - DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS ( "Yes" indicates compliance: "No" indicates non- compliance) PLANNING BOARD OF BOARD EVIDENCE SUBMITTED COMMISSIONERS FINDINGS TO SUPPORT FINDINGS FINDINGS Ordinance Reauirements Article 5 lists standards for minimum lot size, lot width, front, side and rear setbacks, maximum building height and lot coverage, and development intensity. The applicant has applied for a PD -H -RB designation. The standards for that district are set forth in Article 5.1.1 and are as follows: a) Minimum lot area per non- residential use - 87,120 sq. ft. b) Minimum lot width - 130 ft. c) Required front setback - 40 ft. d) Required side and rear setbacks - 20 ft. ' Finding affected by modification, PD -1 -92 _x—Yes No The lot size shown on plan Yes No is 1,110,780 sq. ft- _,,.x —Yes No The lot width shown on plan Yes No is 240 feet. _x —Yes No Typical 40 -foot front yard Yes No setback is noted on plan. _x —Yes No Typical 20 -foot side and rear Yes No yard setbacks are noted on plan.