Orange County NC Website
C0 1 <br />ORANGE C O U N T Y <br />BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS <br />ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT <br />Meeting Date: May 26, 1992 <br />Action Agenda <br />Item # C -3 - q- <br />SUBJECT: PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT <br />ARTICLES 6 AND 22 - HOME OCCUPATIONS <br />DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING _x —yes No <br />ATTACHMENT(S): <br />Proposed Amendment <br />Illustrations <br />INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Scearbo <br />Extension 2583 <br />TELEPHONE NUMBERS: <br />Hillsborough - 732 -8181 <br />Durham - 688 -7331 <br />Mebane - 227 -2031 <br />Chapel Hill - 967 -9251 <br />PURPOSE: To receive citizen comment on a proposed zoning ordinance <br />text amendment, the purpose of which is to create more <br />performance- oriented standards for home occupations. <br />BACKGROUND: The substantive changes proposed in the amendment pertain <br />to setbacks and square footage limits for accessory <br />structures on lots larger than 200,000 square feet <br />(Article 6.16.6.3). The proposed standards would allow <br />greater flexibility in the location of home occupation <br />accessory buildings if the site contained wooded areas or <br />topographic features which provided effective screening. <br />In contrast, the location of structures in open areas <br />would be more restricted in some instances. Other <br />proposed changes involve the use of large existing <br />structures for home occupations activities. <br />The amendment was originated by Planning Staff to address <br />problem situations which have been encountered in <br />administering home occupation regulations. A recent <br />example involved a deep lot about 11 acres in size, with <br />the residence located almost 1000 feet from the road. <br />Current regulations required the home occupation structure <br />to be located in an unsuitable location to the rear of the <br />residence. The desired location was in a wooded area, <br />several hundred feet from the road. The home occupation <br />could not be approved, even though the use would have been <br />very heavily screened, and would not be visible from the <br />roadway. <br />The proposed amendments are the first step in a more <br />comprehensive overhaul of home occupation standards. The <br />