Orange County NC Website
lZ <br />2 R. ALEXANDER ZAFFRE asked that the Board of Commissioners take a <br />3 stand for fair and equitable housing. He asked how many will not be able to <br />4 own a home because of this fee. This systematically takes away the <br />5 opportunities for the middle class -- working class of people. <br />6 <br />7 VERN MILLER stated that his parents worked and paid taxes to live <br />8 in the county to pay for the schools. He questioned taxing a person who has <br />9 lived here all their lives as well as one who is moving into the county. <br />10 Also, he feels that the County should fund the schools first and then <br />11 everything else. He feels that the implementation of impact fees is complex. <br />12 He asked how they justify placing the entire cost of a school on the first <br />13 500 students in that school. In terms of social programs, he has a problem <br />14 with what is his fair share. The table must take into account some of the <br />15general revenue that the County receives. <br />16 <br />17 LARRY CARROLL spoke for the Homebuilders Association of <br />18 Hillsborough and Chapel Hill. He stated that impact fees will increase the <br />19 cost of housing. Construction workers do add to the tax base. Parents have <br />20 been paying taxes and if they decide to build a new home must-then pay <br />21 additional taxes. <br />22 <br />23 HENRY WHITFIELD stated his support to raise taxes. He is upset <br />24 about impact fees. He made reference to OWASA and the high cost of <br />25 availability fees they charge. He asked the Board to forget impact fees <br />26 stating that they are inequity and do not spread out across the population <br />27 and provide equitability. He asked that the Board of County Commissioners <br />28 look at the expenditures for the schools and raise taxes but don't implement <br />29 impact fees. <br />30 <br />31 MAX KENNEDY spoke against the impact fees. He understand that <br />32 there is about an $800,000 shortfall in the county budget this year. The <br />33 impact tax is regressive. The building industry is just coming out of a <br />34 depression. The fee is presented to raise money for the schools. This <br />35 discussion is another nail in the coffin for the school bond issue. <br />36 Nothing has happened with the one million dollar bond passed by the county <br />37 in 1988 for water. The economic impact of many of the fees and requirements <br />38 on the docket have caused housing costs to increase. There are less and less <br />39 opportunity for people to build houses. He urged them to find another way <br />40 to finance the schools. <br />41 <br />42 JOE HERZENBERG read a prepared statement from Kenneth S. Brown about <br />43 the Town Council's concerns about the County's proposed system of school <br />44 impact fees. A copy of this statement is in the Permanent Agenda File in the <br />45 Clerk's Office. <br />46 <br />47 Chair Carey announced that a second public hearing on school impact <br />48 fees will be held on May 26th as part of the Regular Quarterly Public <br />49 Hearing. <br />50 <br />51 <br />52 <br />