Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-26-1992
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1992
>
Agenda - 05-26-1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2017 3:39:04 PM
Creation date
11/8/2017 3:32:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/26/1992
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
306
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' <br />property tax revenues. For example, of Orange County's outstanding <br />general obligation bonds in FY 1991 -92, $31,400,000 had been issued <br />for public schools. Total debt service payments on these bonds, <br />' <br />including principal and interest, will amount to $2,961,400 in <br />FY 1991 -92. Of that amount, $778,889 is to be paid using property <br />tax revenues. The remainder is paid from sales tax proceeds [see <br />' <br />discussion of "Sales Tax Revenues" below]. Assuming a 98 percent <br />tax collection rate, the amount is equivalent to $.0216 of the <br />current tax rate [$.805 per $100 valuation]. If applied to a <br />single - family home with an average value of $135,674 in 1990, the <br />' <br />debt service payment would be $29. <br />The amounts of concern in impact fee calculation are not one- <br />' <br />time payments. Rather, the amounts of concerns are annual payments. <br />This means that there will be a payment in one year, in two years, <br />in three years, etc. Thus, the time -price differential issue <br />becomes one of how to deal with a stream of payments over a number <br />' <br />of years in the future, resulting in a need to cut off the analysis <br />at some point.-Title VI, Chapter 460, of the 1987 Session Laws <br />' <br />establishes a cut off point by requiring Orange County to "estimate <br />the total cost-of improvements ... that will be needed... during <br />a <br />reasonable planning period not to exceed 20 years." For purposes of <br />this analysis, the cut off point is six years, the period of time <br />used by Orange County in its annual Capital Improvements Plan [CIP] <br />for financial planning purposes. Beginning with the FY 1992 -93 CIP, <br />it is also the period of time within which the new school <br />facilities identified by the School Bond Committee and listed below <br />' <br />will be needed. <br />' <br />Fiscal Year School Type School „Eoard <br />FY 1994 -95 Middle Chapel Hill - Carrboro <br />FY 1995 -96 Middle Orange County <br />' <br />FY 1996 -97 <br />High School Chapel Hill - Carrboro <br />FY 1997 -98 Elementary Chapel Hill- Carrboro <br />' <br />Elementary Orange County <br />' <br />Based on the school capital needs above, the task then becomes <br />the provision of fair and reasonable consideration for annual <br />payments toward capital improvements costs over a period of six <br />years. Shown on Tables 10 and 11 are the debt service requirements <br />' <br />during the capital improvement program period. Three different debt <br />service amounts from property taxes are identified. The first <br />amount involves debt incurred prior'to 1988. When a bond issue was <br />approved for school improvements in the late 19701s, the initial <br />debt service payment to retire the bonds was approximately <br />$800,000. The Board of Commissioners adopted a policy holding the <br />amount constant even though the annual debt service payment would <br />decrease. As shown on Table 11, the actual debt service on <br />payment <br />pre -1988 debt decreased from $602,100 in FY 1992 -93 to $490,500 in <br />FY 1993 -94. The difference between the debt service payments and <br />' <br />the $800,000 derived from property taxes is pledged to finance <br />school capital projects. For the six -year capital improvement <br />Page - 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.