Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-26-1992
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1992
>
Agenda - 05-26-1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2017 3:39:04 PM
Creation date
11/8/2017 3:32:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/26/1992
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
306
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Clearly, these standards are significantly higher than both <br />the current "local averages" and the State standards. The higher <br />standards raise the issue of whether the same standards are being <br />applied to both components of the community; i.e., existing <br />development and new development. As indicated previously, if the <br />community wants to raise the existing standards of service, it must <br />identify the existing deficiencies and make provisions to eliminate <br />those deficiencies by means other than impact fees. <br />For the purpose of calculating impact fees for public school <br />facilities, the issue of higher standards suggests again that <br />"local averages" be used. However, neither School Board has <br />formally adopted service standards for public schools, and the use <br />of "local averages" is more a case of historical circumstance than <br />a clear decision on what standards are best for the county. <br />Furthermore, as will be evidenced in this report, the use of State <br />standards shown in Table 6 provides for a more legally defensible <br />and financially affordable system of impact fees. <br />DETERMINING THE COST OF ACCOMMODATING DEVELOPMENT <br />Once physical quantities are established, costs must be <br />determined. The manner in which cost information is obtained or <br />expressed is an important factor in establishing standards because <br />the objective is first to determine capital improvement cost per <br />unit of development and then determine a proportionate share of <br />those costs. It follows that standards, costs, and shares of costs <br />must be in consistent units. <br />The best sources of these data are actual local records. <br />However, local records in terms of new school construction in <br />Orange County are limited. The only new school built in recent <br />years is the New Hope Elementary School,at a cost of approximately <br />$78 per square foot. The same square foot-cost is recommended by <br />the Chapel Hill - Carrboro School Board for its proposed new <br />elementary schools. Another elementary school for the Orange County <br />School Board would probably have a similar square foot cost. In <br />addition, both Chapel Hill - Carrboro and Orange County School Boards <br />want a new middle school, estimated to cost $80 per square foot. <br />Finally, a new high school proposed by the Chapel Hill- Carrboro <br />system is estimated to cost $92 per square foot. <br />These construction costs are well above the $65 per square <br />foot recommended by the N.C. Department of Public Instruction for <br />school planning purposes. A major reason for this is that the new <br />elementary school as well as the others proposed by the two School <br />Boards are considered to be model schools, containing areas for <br />public use such as auditoriums, gymnasiums, and playfields. Because <br />these schools offer facilities which go beyond meeting the basic <br />educational needs of the community, the cost of $65 per square foot <br />recommended by the State was used in the impact fee calculation. <br />Added to this cost were architectural and engineering fees equal to <br />10 percent of the construction cost. Also added was the cost of <br />equipment and furnishings, estimated to be equal to 10 percent of <br />Page - 6 <br />fl <br />L� <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.