Orange County NC Website
May 26, 1992 <br />Orange County Commissioners <br />Orange County Courthouse <br />106 East Margaret Lane <br />Hillsborough, NC <br />RE: Proposed Housing Impact Fees for School Funding <br />Dear Commissioners: <br />/w/1- S /a?d /9 2 <br />RADWAY & WEAVER <br />Planning and Development Consulting <br />147 Lake Ellen Drive <br />Chapel Hill, NC 27514 <br />(919) 942 -2021 <br />I am opposed to the use of Impact Fees for the financing of part or all of the costs of capital facili- <br />ties for either the Orange County or the Chapel Hill - Carrboro school districts. <br />During the last 15 years I have been directly involved in many studies of the impact of new resi- <br />dential development on public facilities - especially schools. Without exception, in communities <br />similar to Orange County and Chapel Hill, my studies have shown that the most significant factor <br />affecting increased school enrollments is demographic change in the existing housing, not the <br />number of children in new housing. <br />I have examined the data provided by the county planning department and collected further infor- <br />mation from both school districts, the 1990 and 1980 census, the municipalities, and several pri- <br />vate sources of building data. I have found no direct relationship and only a marginal indirect rela- <br />tionship between housing development and increased enrollments. School specific enrollments <br />seem to indicate larger increases in enrollment in existing neighborhoods with limited new hous- <br />ing. This is consistent with my findings in about a dozen studies over the last 5 years. <br />A look at the increases by cohort class shows unusual growth between specific grades rather than <br />fairly evenly distributed increases. For Example: <br />Grade I2 Grade 89-W IQ 90 -91 W-91 W 2L-22 <br />K 1 29 63 <br />5 6 66 35 <br />6 7 41 54 <br />8 9 50 40 <br />Select Enrollment Change 186 192 <br />Total Change in Enrollment 250 297 <br />Attached to this letter are several tables and charts I prepared to help myself in understanding the <br />information presented with the proposal for impact fees and the bond issue for new schools. <br />Since there is no existing empirical data on the relationship between housing type and school en- <br />rollment and no plans by any institution to develop such data I can not imagine that the proposal <br />before you can be justified as an exercise of public policy based on a rational nexus connecting the <br />cause of the problem to the effect of the problem to the proposed solution. <br />With regard to the issue of school district needs, my attempt to determine or verify the suggested <br />relationship of housing development to school enrollment growth has led me to conclude that the <br />individual school districts have significantly overestimated the facilities needed during the remain- <br />der of this decade. <br />