Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-21-1992
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1992
>
Agenda - 04-21-1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2017 3:29:48 PM
Creation date
11/8/2017 3:21:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/21/1992
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
364
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-A S <br />SOCIATES;° INC.: r. WHITE 8 <br />. <br />LA <br />- ND USE PLANNING AND DESIGN. . <br />HILLSBOROUGH, N.C. (919) 732 -8528 <br />To: Gene Sell, Planner III <br />From: Wendy Olson, Chair, Orange County TAS <br />Re: Comments concerning the widening of NC 86 from Homestead Road to I -40. <br />Date: 17 April 1992 <br />My comments will focus primarily, but not entirely, on the human environmental impacts <br />of this project and how these road improvements can be a positive change. The safety and <br />convenience of pedestrians and bicyclists as well as motorists concerns me in relation to the <br />proposed alternatives to the widening of NC 86. <br />The land along this stretch of road is rapidly becoming urbanized, mainly for residential <br />purposes. There is already a bus route along this road and pedestrian and bicycle use will <br />continue to increase. For pedestrians and bicyclists, the five lane curb and gutter alternative <br />would be the least desirable. <br />Five lanes of heavily traveled roadway are difficult and sometimes impossible for people <br />to cross. Their safety along the road side would continue to be compromised because the normal <br />curb height of 6" often will not stop or deflect a vehicle that is out of control. Such a situation may <br />become more likely because motorists will also be more prone to speed if the road is the visual <br />equivalent of a freeway. A curbed and guttered road is also less safe for bicyclists because of the <br />trash and debris they must avoid that becomes trapped along the edge. <br />I am assuming that the two alternatives with medians will have grassed swales along the <br />outside edges of the roadway. These swales would have two positive impacts. First, they would be <br />effective protection for pedestrians if the swales are placed between the road and walkway. <br />Second, they would be more efficient at trapping pollutants that accumulate in the runoff from the <br />road surface. These protections may be worth the increased cost of maintenance. <br />Medians provide several positive effects if they are designed and used correctly. They <br />offer a safe island for pedestrians crossing the road and provide space for trees whose shade <br />mitigates the heat and glare of additional pavement. Well designed medians would also <br />encourage slower and safer traffic speeds by visually narrowing the roadway. A twelve foot <br />median width would be just as effective for these purposes ac the wider ones proposed and would <br />have fewer negative impacts on adjacent properties. <br />Please give these environmental aspects of widening NC 86 your serious consideration. <br />These improvements and the provision for bus transit along this road would help to humanize this <br />transportation corridor and encourage the use of alternative transportation, rather than stifling <br />intentions in that direction. <br />Thank you for this opportunity to comment on this matter. <br />N.B. White and Assoc., Inc. 228 S. Churton St., Hillsborough, N.C. 27278. (919) 732 -8528. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.