Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
12 <br />andfatt erip "; > f : a !1 >za ed ` ,:.;:.,.. wo <br />Ian ] d, negate <br />W.. <br />7. DEFINITION OF NEW DEVELOPMENT <br />:..<:;<goaad « 1s timeframe is.. e.eri .::.as.:...ad.equ t.e <br />. t Q <br />allow flex bility for developers without permitting a "rush to <br />subdivide" window of 12 -18 months. <br />10. CRITICAL WATERSHED (CW) DESIGNATION <br />esa n't1:an: >far: ITnae =s't :: '.;'aa3e :gate s3« . <br />Y r ...:: 'd „ The University <br />Take... <br />of 1989 <br />Watershed..... Stud ..........::::.dem....... <br />y oristrated... special conditions <br />that warranted protection measures adopted by Orange County <br />and Carrboro in that year that provide for no further <br />degradation of the water quality in this watershed. The <br />current protection measures go above and beyond the state <br />minimum standards for WS -2, and Critical Watershed designation <br />would provide recognition of that fact. <br />11. UPPER ENO BASIN CLASSIFICATION <br />As previously stated, the preliminary classification of the <br />Eno River basin treats all portions of the basin in the same <br />manner. There are significant differences, however, between <br />sub - basins in the Eno River.. These difference range from <br />density of existing development to location of existing and <br />future water supplies. There are three existing water bodies <br />(two serving as supplies) and three proposed water supplies in <br />the Upper and Middle Eno basins. There are no water supplies <br />existing or proposed in the Lower Eno basin, with the <br />exception of the City of Durham's emergency water intake on <br />the Eno. The future disposition of this emergency water source <br />is currently being discussed by Durham County and Durham City. <br />Historically and to this day, Orange County has separated this <br />basin into the "Upper Eno", located north and west of Lake Ben <br />Johnson in Hillsborough; and the "Lower Eno ", from Lake Ben <br />Johnson to the Durham County line. As such, watershed <br />protection measures similar to that of the proposed WS -III <br />classification have been applied to the zoned portions of the <br />Upper Eno basin since 1984. Recent policy discussion on the <br />implications of Interstate 85/40 and the Efland community have <br />led the County to add a third sub -basin to reflect the <br />different character of the "Middle Eno ", from Corporation Lake <br />to Lake Ben Johnson. <br />in its preliminary watershed classifications, NCDEM has <br />recommended a classification of WS -IV for the entire basin. <br />