Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-01-1992
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1992
>
Agenda - 04-01-1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2017 3:21:34 PM
Creation date
11/8/2017 3:17:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/1/1992
Meeting Type
Assembly of Government
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
248
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
B. MARKET AND INVENTORY CONDITIONS. <br />1. Housing Conditions. Although data are not readily available for current <br />estimates of housing assistance needs of low- and moderate- income <br />households, recent reports from the Town of Chapel Hill Comprehensive <br />Plan, the Orange County Low and Moderate Income Housing Task f=orce, <br />and the Carrboro Planning Department summarize the market conditions <br />in Orange County clearly. Generally, the cost of obtaining housing in <br />the county has risen significantly faster than incomes of families <br />seeking housing in the market. <br />Rental Housing. In the southern part of the county, the rental market has <br />been inflated by the large number of University of North Carolina students <br />who compete with low- and moderate- income families for the lowest cost <br />housing. Because students can live in groups and combine resources, <br />they are able and willing to pay more for rental units than low- and <br />moderate - income families can. Rental units represented 44% of the <br />countywide housing market in 1987, and the 1980 Census estimated that <br />37% of those rental households paid more than 35% of their incomes for <br />rent. <br />While the number of multifamily rental units have increased since 1980, <br />they are generally not -affordable to or appropriate for families. In the <br />Town of Chapel Hill, rental units were 60% of the total housing stock in <br />1980, and between 1980 and 1986, 75% of all building permits issued <br />were for multifamily developments. In the late 1980's, many new <br />multifamily projects were offering premiums of up to 9 months free rent <br />to fill the oversupply of new units, but these premiums are no longer <br />available. In order to afford Chapel Hill's average 3- bedroom rent in <br />1988 of $529, a family of four would have to earn at least $25,000, or <br />about 63% of the area median family income.3 Very low income <br />families (below 50% of the area median) cannot afford even the 1988 <br />average 2- bedroom rent of $442. <br />In 1988, 53.2% of Carrboro's total housing stock was multifamily rental <br />units, concentrated in 14 major apartment complexes. Average 2- <br />bedroom rent was $455, comparable to Chapel Hill, and affordable to a <br />family with $22,200 annual income. Very few 3- bedroom rental units are <br />available in Carrboro. <br />3Affordable Rent calculated using the following methodology: Monthly Rent + <br />Estimated Utilities ($100) = Total Housing Payment. Total Housing Payment/30% <br />(Housing Ratio) = Monthly Income Required. Monthly Income Required X 12 = Annual <br />Income Required. <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.