Orange County NC Website
that the survey is supportive of a May referendum. He hopes the Board of <br />County Commissioners will follow what the survey indicates. <br />In answer to a question from Commissioner Willhoit, Budget <br />Director Sally Kost stated that the delay to November would mean a tighter <br />schedule for completion of new construction but that the target dates could <br />be met. Commissioner Willhoit stressed that a determination needs to be <br />made on how to meet the other needs which have been identified by the two <br />school systems. Chairman Carey stated that a long -range plan will involve <br />policy decisions by the Board of County Commissioners. He will convene the <br />subcommittee for addressing these long -range issues. <br />Motion was made by Commissioner Insko, seconded by Commissioner <br />Halkiotis to set the amount for the bond referendum at 52 million dollars. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />Discussion ensued on when to hold the bond referendum. <br />Commissioner Insko indicated she supports holding the bond referendum at the <br />earliest time it will pass. Commissioner Halkiotis supports waiting until <br />November to allow sufficient time to educate the public and involve more of <br />the citizens so that the next bond referendum will be easier to pass. <br />Commissioner Gordon stated she supports a May referendum because she feels <br />there is a consensus among the elected school officials and that the survey <br />supports a May bond referendum. Chair Carey supports waiting until November <br />and use the extra time to educate the public on the needs of the two school <br />systems. Commissioner Willhoit stated that the May date would not allow <br />enough time to put together a process on developing a plan for meeting the <br />long term needs and preparing the citizens for the need for additional bond <br />money in future years. <br />Motion was made by Commissioner Halkiotis, seconded by <br />Commissioner Willhoit to approve holding the bond referendum in November, <br />1992 and directing the staff to bring back the appropriate resolutions for <br />formal approval. <br />VOTE: AYES, 3; NOES, 2 (Commissioners Gordon and Insko) <br />County Manager John Link indicated to the Board that some <br />planning money could be provided to the two school systems to expedite the <br />planning process for the new schools. He suggested using bond anticipation <br />notes to speed up the funding process. He will bring back a plan for the <br />Board's consideration. <br />Chair Carey asked the County staff to bring back a recommendation <br />for a bond counsel. <br />IX. BOARD COMMENTS <br />Commissioner Halkiotis made reference to the projected cost of <br />new school facilities and asked for an explanation of professional fees and <br />administrative costs for both school systems. He also asked what would be <br />included in the 4.5 million dollars listed for contingency fees. He made <br />reference to the ash in the county landfill and asked for a report on the <br />proposed lowering of tipping fees in an effort to keep this ash in the <br />landfill. Commissioner Willhoit clarified that no decision has been made <br />on lowering the tipping fee for ash disposal. <br />Commissioner Insko stated that there was good attendance at the EMS <br />strategic planning session held last Sunday. Norman Gustaveson is chair of <br />that committee. The outcome of this work will be the development of a <br />master plan for EMS in Orange County. She noted that in the OWASA article <br />